diff mbox

sched/fair: Fix fixed point arithmetic width for shares and effective load

Message ID 1471874441-24701-1-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
State Accepted
Commit ab522e33f91799661aad47bebb691f241a9f6bb8
Headers show

Commit Message

Dietmar Eggemann Aug. 22, 2016, 2 p.m. UTC 
Since commit 2159197d6677 ("sched/core: Enable increased load resolution
on 64-bit kernels") we now have two different fixed point units for
load.
shares in calc_cfs_shares() has 20 bit fixed point unit on 64-bit
kernels. Therefore use scale_load() on MIN_SHARES.
wl in effective_load() has 10 bit fixed point unit. Therefore use
scale_load_down() on tg->shares which has 20 bit fixed point unit on
64-bit kernels.

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

---

Besides the issue with load_above_capacity when it comes to different
fixed point units for load "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix load_above_capacity
fixed point arithmetic width" there are similar issues for shares in
calc_cfs_shares() as well as wl in effective_load().

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 61d485421bed..18f80c4c7737 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2530,8 +2530,8 @@  static long calc_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_group *tg)
 	if (tg_weight)
 		shares /= tg_weight;
 
-	if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
-		shares = MIN_SHARES;
+	if (shares < scale_load(MIN_SHARES))
+		shares = scale_load(MIN_SHARES);
 	if (shares > tg->shares)
 		shares = tg->shares;
 
@@ -5023,9 +5023,9 @@  static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg)
 		 * wl = S * s'_i; see (2)
 		 */
 		if (W > 0 && w < W)
-			wl = (w * (long)tg->shares) / W;
+			wl = (w * (long)scale_load_down(tg->shares)) / W;
 		else
-			wl = tg->shares;
+			wl = scale_load_down(tg->shares);
 
 		/*
 		 * Per the above, wl is the new se->load.weight value; since