[v7,2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Stop reporting warning message when soft reset is not suported

From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>

When the software reset command isn't supported, we now stop reporting
the warning message to avoid unnecessary warnings and potential confusion.

Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>

---
v2. only lower the priority for the not supported failure
v3. replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP and check the first command only
v4. move the version information below the '---' line
v5. remove dev_warn if soft reset operation is not supported
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

On 11/29/23 06:43, AceLan Kao wrote:
> From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
> 

Hi,

> When the software reset command isn't supported, we now stop reporting
> the warning message to avoid unnecessary warnings and potential confusion.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>

You haven't specified who shall take these patches. Is it fine for you
if I take just the SPI NOR bits? If you want Mark to queue both:

Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> v2. only lower the priority for the not supported failure
> v3. replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP and check the first command only
> v4. move the version information below the '---' line
> v5. remove dev_warn if soft reset operation is not supported
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 87cb2047df80..96a207751cf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -3237,7 +3237,8 @@ static void spi_nor_soft_reset(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  
>  	ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_warn(nor->dev, "Software reset failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> +			dev_warn(nor->dev, "Software reset failed: %d\n", ret);
>  		return;
>  	}
>

Hi AceLan,

acelan.kao@canonical.com wrote on Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:43:11 +0800:

> From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
> 
> When the software reset command isn't supported, we now stop reporting
> the warning message to avoid unnecessary warnings and potential confusion.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:46:02AM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:

> You haven't specified who shall take these patches. Is it fine for you
> if I take just the SPI NOR bits? If you want Mark to queue both:

I can certainly take both.  I guess there's no build time dependency so
we could each take the subsystem specific patch, though there'd be some
bisection drift if that happens?

Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> 於 2023年11月30日 週四 上午5:19寫道：
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:46:02AM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
> > You haven't specified who shall take these patches. Is it fine for you
> > if I take just the SPI NOR bits? If you want Mark to queue both:
>
> I can certainly take both.  I guess there's no build time dependency so
> we could each take the subsystem specific patch, though there'd be some
> bisection drift if that happens?
Hi Mark,

It'd be better if you could take both of them.
Thanks.

On 11/29/23 21:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:46:02AM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
>> You haven't specified who shall take these patches. Is it fine for you
>> if I take just the SPI NOR bits? If you want Mark to queue both:
> 
> I can certainly take both.  I guess there's no build time dependency so
> we could each take the subsystem specific patch, though there'd be some
> bisection drift if that happens?

Right, please take both then. Thanks!