pinctrl: samsung: constify iomem pointers

Constify few pointers to iomem, where the destination memory is not
modified, for code safety and readability.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c  | 4 ++--
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 1:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Constify few pointers to iomem, where the destination memory is not
> modified, for code safety and readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>

>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c  | 4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
> index d3d4b5d036c8..871c1eb46ddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
> @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_suspend_bank(
>                                 struct samsung_pin_bank *bank)
>  {
>         struct exynos_eint_gpio_save *save = bank->soc_priv;
> -       void __iomem *regs = bank->eint_base;
> +       const void __iomem *regs = bank->eint_base;
>
>         save->eint_con = readl(regs + EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET
>                                                 + bank->eint_offset);
> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static void exynosauto_pinctrl_suspend_bank(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drv
>                                             struct samsung_pin_bank *bank)
>  {
>         struct exynos_eint_gpio_save *save = bank->soc_priv;
> -       void __iomem *regs = bank->eint_base;
> +       const void __iomem *regs = bank->eint_base;
>
>         save->eint_con = readl(regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_con_offset);
>         save->eint_mask = readl(regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_mask_offset);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> index dbf38767f15f..ed07e23e0912 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static void samsung_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
>  /* gpiolib gpio_get callback function */
>  static int samsung_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
>  {
> -       void __iomem *reg;
> +       const void __iomem *reg;
>         u32 data;
>         struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>         const struct samsung_pin_bank_type *type = bank->type;
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused samsung_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
>         for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_banks; i++) {
>                 struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = &drvdata->pin_banks[i];
> -               void __iomem *reg = bank->pctl_base + bank->pctl_offset;
> +               const void __iomem *reg = bank->pctl_base + bank->pctl_offset;
>                 const u8 *offs = bank->type->reg_offset;
>                 const u8 *widths = bank->type->fld_width;
>                 enum pincfg_type type;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 8:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> Constify few pointers to iomem, where the destination memory is not
> modified, for code safety and readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Is this something I should just apply directly at this point?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

On 28/12/2023 01:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 8:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> Constify few pointers to iomem, where the destination memory is not
>> modified, for code safety and readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> Is this something I should just apply directly at this point?

Yes, please take it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 8:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> Constify few pointers to iomem, where the destination memory is not
> modified, for code safety and readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Patch applied!

Yours,
Linus Walleij