diff mbox

[v6,3/5] gpio: pca953x: refactor pca953x_read_regs()

Message ID 1473412658-13120-4-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com
State Accepted
Commit c6e3cf01d31d88d35a8fbf8bf4773b737fa48f21
Headers show

Commit Message

Bartosz Golaszewski Sept. 9, 2016, 9:17 a.m. UTC 
Avoid the unnecessary if-else in pca953x_read_regs() by spltting the
routine into smaller, specialized functions and calling the right one
via a function pointer held in struct pca953x.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

Comments

Linus Walleij Sept. 12, 2016, 12:47 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:

> Avoid the unnecessary if-else in pca953x_read_regs() by spltting the

> routine into smaller, specialized functions and calling the right one

> via a function pointer held in struct pca953x.

>

> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>


Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index e9defeb..e7bf3b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@  struct pca953x_chip {
 	const struct pca953x_reg_config *regs;
 
 	int (*write_regs)(struct pca953x_chip *, int, u8 *);
+	int (*read_regs)(struct pca953x_chip *, int, u8 *);
 };
 
 static int pca953x_read_single(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u32 *val,
@@ -222,24 +223,41 @@  static int pca953x_write_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int pca953x_read_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+static int pca953x_read_regs_8(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio <= 8) {
-		ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(chip->client, reg);
-		*val = ret;
-	} else if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio >= 24) {
-		int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
+	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(chip->client, reg);
+	*val = ret;
 
-		ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
-					(reg << bank_shift) | REG_ADDR_AI,
-					NBANK(chip), val);
-	} else {
-		ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(chip->client, reg << 1);
-		val[0] = (u16)ret & 0xFF;
-		val[1] = (u16)ret >> 8;
-	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int pca953x_read_regs_16(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(chip->client, reg << 1);
+	val[0] = (u16)ret & 0xFF;
+	val[1] = (u16)ret >> 8;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int pca953x_read_regs_24(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+{
+	int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
+
+	return i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
+					     (reg << bank_shift) | REG_ADDR_AI,
+					     NBANK(chip), val);
+}
+
+static int pca953x_read_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = chip->read_regs(chip, reg, val);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "failed reading register\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -784,13 +802,16 @@  static int pca953x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 
 	if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio <= 8) {
 		chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_8;
+		chip->read_regs = pca953x_read_regs_8;
 	} else if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio >= 24) {
 		chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_24;
+		chip->read_regs = pca953x_read_regs_24;
 	} else {
 		if (PCA_CHIP_TYPE(chip->driver_data) == PCA953X_TYPE)
 			chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_16;
 		else
 			chip->write_regs = pca957x_write_regs_16;
+		chip->read_regs = pca953x_read_regs_16;
 	}
 
 	if (chip->chip_type == PCA953X_TYPE)