| Message ID | 20240125-topic-thermal-v1-2-3c9d4dced138@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 488164006a281986d95abbc4b26e340c19c4c85b |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent | expand |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 01:11:16PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts > for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay > of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards. > > Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling". > > Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Regards, Bjorn > --- > drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c > index 4d6c22e0ed85..61bbd42aa2cb 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c > @@ -225,14 +225,18 @@ static int thermal_of_monitor_init(struct device_node *np, int *delay, int *pdel > int ret; > > ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay-passive", pdelay); > - if (ret < 0) { > - pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay-passive property\n", np); > + if (ret == -EINVAL) { > + *pdelay = 0; > + } else if (ret < 0) { > + pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay-passive: %d\n", np, ret); > return ret; > } > > ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay", delay); > - if (ret < 0) { > - pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay property\n", np); > + if (ret == -EINVAL) { > + *delay = 0; > + } else if (ret < 0) { > + pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay: %d\n", np, ret); > return ret; > } > > > -- > 2.40.1 >
On 25/01/2024 14:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts > for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay > of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards. > > Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling". > > Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c index 4d6c22e0ed85..61bbd42aa2cb 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c @@ -225,14 +225,18 @@ static int thermal_of_monitor_init(struct device_node *np, int *delay, int *pdel int ret; ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay-passive", pdelay); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay-passive property\n", np); + if (ret == -EINVAL) { + *pdelay = 0; + } else if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay-passive: %d\n", np, ret); return ret; } ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay", delay); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay property\n", np); + if (ret == -EINVAL) { + *delay = 0; + } else if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay: %d\n", np, ret); return ret; }
Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards. Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling". Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> --- drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)