@@ -117,27 +117,13 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!bank)
return -ENOMEM;
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank);
-
for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
- return hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
+ return devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
base_id, num_locks);
}
-static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int ret;
-
- ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
- return;
- }
-}
-
static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "ti,omap4-hwspinlock", },
{ .compatible = "ti,am64-hwspinlock", },
@@ -148,7 +134,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_hwspinlock_of_match);
static struct platform_driver omap_hwspinlock_driver = {
.probe = omap_hwspinlock_probe,
- .remove_new = omap_hwspinlock_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "omap_hwspinlock",
.of_match_table = omap_hwspinlock_of_match,
This will unregister the HW spinlock on module exit automatically for us, currently we manually unregister which can be error-prone if not done in the right order. This also allows us to remove the remove callback. Do that here. Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> --- Changes for v2: - Clarify commit message drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 17 +---------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)