@@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
}
switch (c) {
case 'f':
- if ((num_fds = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
+ num_fds = atoi(optarg);
+ if (atoi(optarg) <= 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: --fds|-f requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
print_usage_exit(1);
}
@@ -435,7 +436,8 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
fifo = 1;
break;
case 'g':
- if ((num_groups = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
+ num_groups = atoi(optarg);
+ if (atoi(optarg) <= 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: --groups|-g requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
print_usage_exit(1);
}
@@ -444,7 +446,8 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
print_usage_exit(0);
break;
case 'l':
- if ((loops = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
+ loops = atoi(optarg);
+ if (atoi(optarg) <= 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: --loops|-l requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
print_usage_exit(1);
}
@@ -456,7 +459,8 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[])
use_inet = 1;
break;
case 's':
- if ((datasize = atoi(optarg)) <= 0) {
+ datasize = atoi(optarg);
+ if (atoi(optarg) <= 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: --datasize|-s requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]);
print_usage_exit(1);
}
Previously hackbench would allow options to accept negative arguments, which would result in undefined behavior. Now process_options() properly catches when arguments are negative. Signed-off-by: Anubhav Shelat <ashelat@redhat.com> --- src/hackbench/hackbench.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)