diff mbox series

cpuidle: menu: Cleanup after loadavg removal

Message ID 7d999005-4441-4b8a-b159-3d0ebc2ed9d9@arm.com
State Accepted
Commit bf183113842b0fcf4b6f977a97fa9cf8e2b21625
Headers show
Series cpuidle: menu: Cleanup after loadavg removal | expand

Commit Message

Christian Loehle June 4, 2024, 10:55 a.m. UTC
The performance impact of loadavg was removed with commit a7fe5190c03f
("cpuidle: menu: Remove get_loadavg() from the performance multiplier")
With only iowait remaining the description can be simplified, remove
also the no longer needed includes.

Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Rafael J. Wysocki June 7, 2024, 6:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:55 PM Christian Loehle
<christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
>
> The performance impact of loadavg was removed with commit a7fe5190c03f
> ("cpuidle: menu: Remove get_loadavg() from the performance multiplier")
> With only iowait remaining the description can be simplified, remove
> also the no longer needed includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 17 +++++------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> index b96e3da0fedd..783b5d1dacdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> @@ -14,8 +14,6 @@
>  #include <linux/ktime.h>
>  #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>  #include <linux/tick.h>
> -#include <linux/sched.h>
> -#include <linux/sched/loadavg.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/stat.h>
>  #include <linux/math64.h>
>
> @@ -95,16 +93,11 @@
>   * state, and thus the less likely a busy CPU will hit such a deep
>   * C state.
>   *
> - * Two factors are used in determing this multiplier:
> - * a value of 10 is added for each point of "per cpu load average" we have.
> - * a value of 5 points is added for each process that is waiting for
> - * IO on this CPU.
> - * (these values are experimentally determined)
> - *
> - * The load average factor gives a longer term (few seconds) input to the
> - * decision, while the iowait value gives a cpu local instantanious input.
> - * The iowait factor may look low, but realize that this is also already
> - * represented in the system load average.
> + * Currently there is only one value determining the factor:
> + * 10 points are added for each process that is waiting for IO on this CPU.
> + * (This value was experimentally determined.)
> + * Utilization is no longer a factor as it was shown that it never contributed
> + * significantly to the performance multiplier in the first place.
>   *
>   */
>
> --

Applied as 6.11 material, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index b96e3da0fedd..783b5d1dacdc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ 
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
 #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
 #include <linux/tick.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/sched/loadavg.h>
 #include <linux/sched/stat.h>
 #include <linux/math64.h>
 
@@ -95,16 +93,11 @@ 
  * state, and thus the less likely a busy CPU will hit such a deep
  * C state.
  *
- * Two factors are used in determing this multiplier:
- * a value of 10 is added for each point of "per cpu load average" we have.
- * a value of 5 points is added for each process that is waiting for
- * IO on this CPU.
- * (these values are experimentally determined)
- *
- * The load average factor gives a longer term (few seconds) input to the
- * decision, while the iowait value gives a cpu local instantanious input.
- * The iowait factor may look low, but realize that this is also already
- * represented in the system load average.
+ * Currently there is only one value determining the factor:
+ * 10 points are added for each process that is waiting for IO on this CPU.
+ * (This value was experimentally determined.)
+ * Utilization is no longer a factor as it was shown that it never contributed
+ * significantly to the performance multiplier in the first place.
  *
  */