diff mbox series

selftests/mm: do not try to split below filesystem block size

Message ID 20240826145344.33665-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com
State New
Headers show
Series selftests/mm: do not try to split below filesystem block size | expand

Commit Message

Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) Aug. 26, 2024, 2:53 p.m. UTC
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

There is no point trying to split pagecache thp below the blocksize of
the filesystem as that is the minimum order that pagecache needs to
maintain to support blocksizes greater than pagesize [1].

Set the lower limit for the splitting order to be the fs blocksize
order.

As the number of tests will now depend on the minimum splitting order,
move the file preparation before calling ksft_set_plan().

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240822135018.1931258-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com/

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
 .../selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c       | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


base-commit: 5771112c37523a2344b346d7fe613694a2566df9

Comments

Zi Yan Aug. 26, 2024, 2:59 p.m. UTC | #1
On 26 Aug 2024, at 10:53, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:

> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>
> There is no point trying to split pagecache thp below the blocksize of
> the filesystem as that is the minimum order that pagecache needs to
> maintain to support blocksizes greater than pagesize [1].

But the purpose of the tests is to make sure all cases are properly handled,
right? If we do not test splitting pagecache large folio below the
block size, we will never know if a kernel change breaks the handling.

Just my two cents.

>
> Set the lower limit for the splitting order to be the fs blocksize
> order.
>
> As the number of tests will now depend on the minimum splitting order,
> move the file preparation before calling ksft_set_plan().
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240822135018.1931258-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c       | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
index e5e8dafc9d94..187fe9107998 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
@@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ 
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <stdarg.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
+#include <math.h>
 #include <inttypes.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/mount.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <malloc.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <time.h>
@@ -404,9 +406,10 @@  void split_thp_in_pagecache_to_order(size_t fd_size, int order, const char *fs_l
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, min_split_order = 0;
 	size_t fd_size;
 	char *optional_xfs_path = NULL;
+	struct stat filestat;
 	char fs_loc_template[] = "/tmp/thp_fs_XXXXXX";
 	const char *fs_loc;
 	bool created_tmp;
@@ -421,8 +424,6 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	if (argc > 1)
 		optional_xfs_path = argv[1];
 
-	ksft_set_plan(3+9);
-
 	pagesize = getpagesize();
 	pageshift = ffs(pagesize) - 1;
 	pmd_pagesize = read_pmd_pagesize();
@@ -431,13 +432,19 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	fd_size = 2 * pmd_pagesize;
 
+	created_tmp = prepare_thp_fs(optional_xfs_path, fs_loc_template,
+			&fs_loc);
+
+	if (!stat(fs_loc, &filestat))
+		min_split_order = log2(filestat.st_blksize) - pageshift;
+
+	ksft_set_plan(3 + 9 - min_split_order);
+
 	split_pmd_thp();
 	split_pte_mapped_thp();
 	split_file_backed_thp();
 
-	created_tmp = prepare_thp_fs(optional_xfs_path, fs_loc_template,
-			&fs_loc);
-	for (i = 8; i >= 0; i--)
+	for (i = 8; i >= min_split_order; i--)
 		split_thp_in_pagecache_to_order(fd_size, i, fs_loc);
 	cleanup_thp_fs(fs_loc, created_tmp);