| Message ID | 20241103210251.762050-1-andreas@kemnade.info |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | cpufreq: fix using cpufreq-dt as module | expand |
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> writes: > E.g. omap2plus_defconfig compiles cpufreq-dt as module. As there is no > module alias nor a module_init(), cpufreq-dt-platdev will not be used and > therefore on several omap platforms there is no cpufreq. > > Enforce builtin compile of cpufreq-dt-platdev to make it effective. > > Fixes: 3b062a086984 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Support building as module") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> I'd much rather see this fixed to work as a module. You already hinted at the right way to do that, so please do that instead. Kevin
Am Mon, 04 Nov 2024 10:35:26 -0800 schrieb Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>: > Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> writes: > > > E.g. omap2plus_defconfig compiles cpufreq-dt as module. As there is > > no module alias nor a module_init(), cpufreq-dt-platdev will not be > > used and therefore on several omap platforms there is no cpufreq. > > > > Enforce builtin compile of cpufreq-dt-platdev to make it effective. > > > > Fixes: 3b062a086984 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Support building as > > module") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> > > I'd much rather see this fixed to work as a module. You already > hinted at the right way to do that, so please do that instead. > no clear idea how. What aliases should I add? The cpufreq-dt-platdev is not a real driver, so I could not create mod_devicetable aliases to match a given device. It constructs a device under certain conditions depending on the board compatible, so no simple list of compatibles, it contains allow and blocklists. cpufreq-dt then binds to that device and that one can be built as a module (which then made cpufreq-dt-platdev also a module, causing the trouble). I do not see any benefit from having cpufreq-dt-platdev as a module. ti-cpufreq has a similar role and is also just builtin. It does itself no real work but provides a device cpufreq-dt then binds to. Handling module removal would probably need to be added and tested. I feel not comfortable having such as a regression fix and for stable. Regards, Andreas
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig index 2561b215432a8..4547adf5d2a7d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ config CPUFREQ_DT If in doubt, say N. config CPUFREQ_DT_PLATDEV - tristate "Generic DT based cpufreq platdev driver" + bool "Generic DT based cpufreq platdev driver" depends on OF help This adds a generic DT based cpufreq platdev driver for frequency diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c index 18942bfe9c95f..78ad3221fe077 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c @@ -234,5 +234,3 @@ static int __init cpufreq_dt_platdev_init(void) sizeof(struct cpufreq_dt_platform_data))); } core_initcall(cpufreq_dt_platdev_init); -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic DT based cpufreq platdev driver"); -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
E.g. omap2plus_defconfig compiles cpufreq-dt as module. As there is no module alias nor a module_init(), cpufreq-dt-platdev will not be used and therefore on several omap platforms there is no cpufreq. Enforce builtin compile of cpufreq-dt-platdev to make it effective. Fixes: 3b062a086984 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Support building as module") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> --- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)