Message ID | 20241102025559.2256734-3-huangchenghai2@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3,1/2] crypto: hisilicon/sec2 - fix for aead icv error | expand |
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:55:59AM +0800, Chenghai Huang wrote: > > @@ -2226,15 +2236,15 @@ static int sec_aead_spec_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq) > struct device *dev = ctx->dev; > int ret; > > - if (unlikely(req->cryptlen + req->assoclen > MAX_INPUT_DATA_LEN || > - req->assoclen > SEC_MAX_AAD_LEN)) { > - dev_err(dev, "aead input spec error!\n"); > + /* Hardware does not handle cases where authsize is less than 4 bytes */ > + if (unlikely(sz < MIN_MAC_LEN)) { > + ctx->a_ctx.fallback = true; This is broken. sec_aead_spec_check is a per-request function, called without any locking. Therefore it must not modify any field in the tfm context (at least not without additional locking), because multiple requests can be issued on the same tfm at any time. I suppose for this field in particular you could move it to set_authsize and there it would be safe to change the tfm context. Cheers,
在 2024/11/10 11:36, Herbert Xu 写道: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:55:59AM +0800, Chenghai Huang wrote: >> @@ -2226,15 +2236,15 @@ static int sec_aead_spec_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq) >> struct device *dev = ctx->dev; >> int ret; >> >> - if (unlikely(req->cryptlen + req->assoclen > MAX_INPUT_DATA_LEN || >> - req->assoclen > SEC_MAX_AAD_LEN)) { >> - dev_err(dev, "aead input spec error!\n"); >> + /* Hardware does not handle cases where authsize is less than 4 bytes */ >> + if (unlikely(sz < MIN_MAC_LEN)) { >> + ctx->a_ctx.fallback = true; > This is broken. sec_aead_spec_check is a per-request function, > called without any locking. Therefore it must not modify any > field in the tfm context (at least not without additional locking), > because multiple requests can be issued on the same tfm at any time. > > I suppose for this field in particular you could move it to > set_authsize and there it would be safe to change the tfm context. > > Cheers, Hi, Thanks for your advice, it's better to move the setup to set_authsize, I will send a new patchset soon.
在 2024/11/10 11:36, Herbert Xu 写道: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 10:55:59AM +0800, Chenghai Huang wrote: >> @@ -2226,15 +2236,15 @@ static int sec_aead_spec_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq) >> struct device *dev = ctx->dev; >> int ret; >> >> - if (unlikely(req->cryptlen + req->assoclen > MAX_INPUT_DATA_LEN || >> - req->assoclen > SEC_MAX_AAD_LEN)) { >> - dev_err(dev, "aead input spec error!\n"); >> + /* Hardware does not handle cases where authsize is less than 4 bytes */ >> + if (unlikely(sz < MIN_MAC_LEN)) { >> + ctx->a_ctx.fallback = true; > This is broken. sec_aead_spec_check is a per-request function, > called without any locking. Therefore it must not modify any > field in the tfm context (at least not without additional locking), > because multiple requests can be issued on the same tfm at any time. > > I suppose for this field in particular you could move it to > set_authsize and there it would be safe to change the tfm context. > > Cheers, Hi, I have found another setup for fallback in the sec_aead_param_check function, so I need to fix it right too. The orignal code: static int sec_aead_param_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq) { if (ctx->sec->qm.ver == QM_HW_V2) { if (unlikely(!req->cryptlen || (!sreq->c_req.encrypt && req->cryptlen <= authsize))) { ctx->a_ctx.fallback = true; return -EINVAL; } } } After the modification, I used a temporary variable fallback to save the state: static int sec_aead_param_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq, bool *fallback) { if (ctx->sec->qm.ver == QM_HW_V2) { if (unlikely(!req->cryptlen || (!sreq->c_req.encrypt && req->cryptlen <= authsize))) { *fallback = true; return -EINVAL; } } } Same with the sec_aead_spec_check function. static int sec_aead_spec_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq, bool *fallback) { /* Hardware does not handle cases where authsize is less than 4 bytes */ if (unlikely(sz < MIN_MAC_LEN)) { *fallback = true; return -EINVAL; } } Do you think it is a better way? Thanks,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:47:11PM +0800, linwenkai (C) wrote: > > I have found another setup for fallback in the sec_aead_param_check > function, so I need to fix it right too. So you want to determine whether to use the fallback based on the parameters of the request. In that case I think you should create a new fallback field in the request context. Set its initial value to that of the tfm context fallback variable, and then modify it based on the request parameters. Cheers,
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c index 8db995279545..2d260cdda584 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c @@ -1119,10 +1119,7 @@ static int sec_aead_setauthsize(struct crypto_aead *aead, unsigned int authsize) struct sec_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); struct sec_auth_ctx *a_ctx = &ctx->a_ctx; - if (unlikely(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm)) - return crypto_aead_setauthsize(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm, authsize); - - return 0; + return crypto_aead_setauthsize(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm, authsize); } static int sec_aead_fallback_setkey(struct sec_auth_ctx *a_ctx, @@ -1159,13 +1156,7 @@ static int sec_aead_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key, } memcpy(c_ctx->c_key, key, keylen); - if (unlikely(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm)) { - ret = sec_aead_fallback_setkey(a_ctx, tfm, key, keylen); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - - return 0; + return sec_aead_fallback_setkey(a_ctx, tfm, key, keylen); } ret = crypto_authenc_extractkeys(&keys, key, keylen); @@ -1190,6 +1181,12 @@ static int sec_aead_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key, goto bad_key; } + ret = sec_aead_fallback_setkey(a_ctx, tfm, key, keylen); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "set sec fallback key err!\n"); + goto bad_key; + } + return 0; bad_key: @@ -1917,8 +1914,10 @@ static void sec_aead_exit(struct crypto_aead *tfm) static int sec_aead_ctx_init(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const char *hash_name) { + struct aead_alg *alg = crypto_aead_alg(tfm); struct sec_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm); - struct sec_auth_ctx *auth_ctx = &ctx->a_ctx; + struct sec_auth_ctx *a_ctx = &ctx->a_ctx; + const char *aead_name = alg->base.cra_name; int ret; ret = sec_aead_init(tfm); @@ -1927,12 +1926,22 @@ static int sec_aead_ctx_init(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const char *hash_name) return ret; } - auth_ctx->hash_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hash_name, 0, 0); - if (IS_ERR(auth_ctx->hash_tfm)) { + a_ctx->hash_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hash_name, 0, 0); + if (IS_ERR(a_ctx->hash_tfm)) { dev_err(ctx->dev, "aead alloc shash error!\n"); sec_aead_exit(tfm); - return PTR_ERR(auth_ctx->hash_tfm); + return PTR_ERR(a_ctx->hash_tfm); + } + + a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm = crypto_alloc_aead(aead_name, 0, + CRYPTO_ALG_NEED_FALLBACK | CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC); + if (IS_ERR(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm)) { + dev_err(ctx->dev, "aead driver alloc fallback tfm error!\n"); + crypto_free_shash(ctx->a_ctx.hash_tfm); + sec_aead_exit(tfm); + return PTR_ERR(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm); } + a_ctx->fallback = false; return 0; } @@ -1941,6 +1950,7 @@ static void sec_aead_ctx_exit(struct crypto_aead *tfm) { struct sec_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm); + crypto_free_aead(ctx->a_ctx.fallback_aead_tfm); crypto_free_shash(ctx->a_ctx.hash_tfm); sec_aead_exit(tfm); } @@ -2226,15 +2236,15 @@ static int sec_aead_spec_check(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *sreq) struct device *dev = ctx->dev; int ret; - if (unlikely(req->cryptlen + req->assoclen > MAX_INPUT_DATA_LEN || - req->assoclen > SEC_MAX_AAD_LEN)) { - dev_err(dev, "aead input spec error!\n"); + /* Hardware does not handle cases where authsize is less than 4 bytes */ + if (unlikely(sz < MIN_MAC_LEN)) { + ctx->a_ctx.fallback = true; return -EINVAL; } - if (unlikely((c_mode == SEC_CMODE_GCM && sz < DES_BLOCK_SIZE) || - (c_mode == SEC_CMODE_CCM && (sz < MIN_MAC_LEN || sz & MAC_LEN_MASK)))) { - dev_err(dev, "aead input mac length error!\n"); + if (unlikely(req->cryptlen + req->assoclen > MAX_INPUT_DATA_LEN || + req->assoclen > SEC_MAX_AAD_LEN)) { + dev_err(dev, "aead input spec error!\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2308,16 +2318,9 @@ static int sec_aead_soft_crypto(struct sec_ctx *ctx, bool encrypt) { struct sec_auth_ctx *a_ctx = &ctx->a_ctx; - struct device *dev = ctx->dev; struct aead_request *subreq; int ret; - /* Kunpeng920 aead mode not support input 0 size */ - if (!a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm) { - dev_err(dev, "aead fallback tfm is NULL!\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - subreq = aead_request_alloc(a_ctx->fallback_aead_tfm, GFP_KERNEL); if (!subreq) return -ENOMEM;