diff mbox series

wifi: rtw89: coex: set higher priority to BT when WL scan and BT A2DP exist

Message ID 20241031023032.7102-1-pkshih@realtek.com
State New
Headers show
Series wifi: rtw89: coex: set higher priority to BT when WL scan and BT A2DP exist | expand

Commit Message

Ping-Ke Shih Oct. 31, 2024, 2:30 a.m. UTC 
From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>

If WiFi operation channel & scan channel both at 2.4GHz, original will keep
going at WL > BT priority table for a long time. It makes A2DP can not sent
audio data to SUT device in time then performed a lag audio. Assign
a BT > WL priority table when A2DP exist, to avoid the issue.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ping-Ke Shih Nov. 6, 2024, 6:28 a.m. UTC | #1 
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:

> From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
> 
> If WiFi operation channel & scan channel both at 2.4GHz, original will keep
> going at WL > BT priority table for a long time. It makes A2DP can not sent
> audio data to SUT device in time then performed a lag audio. Assign
> a BT > WL priority table when A2DP exist, to avoid the issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

1 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks.

1b1350e2008c wifi: rtw89: coex: set higher priority to BT when WL scan and BT A2DP exist

---
https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 8a65722dd1fd..544f390596df 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -3695,6 +3695,7 @@  void rtw89_btc_set_policy_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u16 policy_type)
 	struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
 	struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_tdma *t = &dm->tdma;
 	struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info_v1 *wl_rinfo = &btc->cx.wl.role_info_v1;
+	struct rtw89_btc_bt_a2dp_desc *a2dp = &btc->cx.bt.link_info.a2dp_desc;
 	struct rtw89_btc_bt_hid_desc *hid = &btc->cx.bt.link_info.hid_desc;
 	struct rtw89_btc_bt_hfp_desc *hfp = &btc->cx.bt.link_info.hfp_desc;
 	struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &btc->cx.wl;
@@ -3853,7 +3854,10 @@  void rtw89_btc_set_policy_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u16 policy_type)
 				     s_def[CXST_ENULL].cxtbl, s_def[CXST_ENULL].cxtype);
 			break;
 		case BTC_CXP_OFFE_2GBWMIXB:
-			_slot_set(btc, CXST_E2G, 0, tbl_w1, SLOT_MIX);
+			if (a2dp->exist)
+				_slot_set(btc, CXST_E2G, 0, cxtbl[2], SLOT_MIX);
+			else
+				_slot_set(btc, CXST_E2G, 0, tbl_w1, SLOT_MIX);
 			_slot_set_le(btc, CXST_EBT, s_def[CXST_EBT].dur,
 				     s_def[CXST_EBT].cxtbl, s_def[CXST_EBT].cxtype);
 			break;