@@ -449,23 +449,16 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
(c->x86_stepping < 0x6 || c->x86_stepping == 0xb))
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_11AP);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
/*
* Set up the preferred alignment for movsl bulk memory moves
+ * Family 4 - 486: untested
+ * Family 5 - Pentium: untested
+ * Family 6 - PII/PIII only like movsl with 8-byte alignment
+ * Family 15 - P4 is OK down to 8-byte alignment
*/
- switch (c->x86) {
- case 4: /* 486: untested */
- break;
- case 5: /* Old Pentia: untested */
- break;
- case 6: /* PII/PIII only like movsl with 8-byte alignment */
- movsl_mask.mask = 7;
- break;
- case 15: /* P4 is OK down to 8-byte alignment */
+ if (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO)
movsl_mask.mask = 7;
- break;
- }
#endif
intel_smp_check(c);
@@ -563,7 +556,7 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (c->x86 == 15)
c->x86_cache_alignment = c->x86_clflush_size * 2;
- if (c->x86 == 6)
+ if (c->x86 == 6 || c->x86 > 15)
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD);
#else
/*
X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD is only set for family 6 processors. Extend the check to family numbers beyond 15. It is uncertain whether the Pentium 4s (family 15) should set the feature flag as well. Commit 185f3b9da24c ("x86: make intel.c have 64-bit support code") that originally set X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD also set the x86_cache_alignment preference for family 15 processors. The omission of the family 15 seems intentional. Also, the 32-bit user copy alignment preference is only set for family 6 and 15 processors. Extend the preference to family numbers beyond 15. Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 19 ++++++------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)