| Message ID | 20250127221052.197899-2-deaner92@yahoo.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Bluetooth: Remove unnecessary braces around single line statement | expand |
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=928654 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PENDING 0.37 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.24 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.10 seconds BuildKernel PASS 24.21 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 27.14 seconds CheckSparse PASS 30.24 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 27.66 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 424.07 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 20.29 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 27.05 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 4.75 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 121.36 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 7.54 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 9.38 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 14.45 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 5.93 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 6.93 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 4.92 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.51 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - PENDING Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script Output: ############################## Test: GitLint - PENDING Desc: Run gitlint Output: ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 490, Passed: 483 (98.6%), Failed: 3, Not Run: 4 Failed Test Cases LL Privacy - Add Device 3 (AL is full) Failed 0.186 seconds LL Privacy - Set Flags 1 (Add to RL) Failed 0.148 seconds LL Privacy - Start Discovery 2 (Disable RL) Failed 0.165 seconds ############################## Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output: --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth
It looks like this is failing a test case at tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester. Is this test failing because of the test itself? How can test or description of the test be obtained so that the necessary modifications can be made? Jeremy
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 02:31:06PM -0800, bluez.test.bot@gmail.com wrote: CCing Markus Elfring, your esmpt server kicked back the message. Jeremy
Hi Jeremy, On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 1:30 AM Jeremy Dean <deaner92@yahoo.com> wrote: > > It looks like this is failing a test case at > tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester. > > Is this test failing because of the test itself? > How can test or description of the test be obtained so that > the necessary modifications can be made? That is some race with mgmt-tester it seems, not related to the problem, that said you didn't include the output of checkpatch.pl that you are trying to fix. You can use git commit --amend and git format-patch -v2 + git send-email to send the v2. > Jeremy >
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c index cab93935cc7f..0d6ad50da046 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c @@ -365,9 +365,8 @@ static void bfusb_rx_complete(struct urb *urb) buf += 3; } - if (count < len) { + if (count < len) bt_dev_err(data->hdev, "block extends over URB buffer ranges"); - } if ((hdr & 0xe1) == 0xc1) bfusb_recv_block(data, hdr, buf, len);