@@ -449,23 +449,16 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
(c->x86_stepping < 0x6 || c->x86_stepping == 0xb))
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_11AP);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
/*
- * Set up the preferred alignment for movsl bulk memory moves
+ * movsl bulk memory moves can be slow when source and dest are not
+ * both 8-byte aligned. PII/PIII only like movsl with 8-byte alignment.
+ *
+ * Set the preferred alignment for Pentium Pro and newer processors, as
+ * it has only been tested on these.
*/
- switch (c->x86) {
- case 4: /* 486: untested */
- break;
- case 5: /* Old Pentia: untested */
- break;
- case 6: /* PII/PIII only like movsl with 8-byte alignment */
+ if (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO)
movsl_mask.mask = 7;
- break;
- case 15: /* P4 is OK down to 8-byte alignment */
- movsl_mask.mask = 7;
- break;
- }
#endif
intel_smp_check(c);
The alignment preference for 32-bit movsl based bulk memory move has been 8-byte for a long time. However this preference is only set for Family 6 and 15 processors. Extend the preference to upcoming Family numbers 18 and 19 to maintain legacy behavior. Also, use a VFM based check instead of switching based on Family numbers. Refresh the comment to reflect the new check. Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> --- v2: Split the patch into two parts. Update commit message. --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 19 ++++++------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)