diff mbox series

[v2,09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing policies

Message ID 20250215005244.1212285-10-superm1@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series amd-pstate cleanups | expand

Commit Message

Mario Limonciello Feb. 15, 2025, 12:52 a.m. UTC 
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

If a CPU is missing a policy then the unit test is skipped for the rest
of the CPUs on the system.

Instead just skip the rest of that test and continue to test the rest
of them.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v2:
 * new patch

 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Gautham R. Shenoy Feb. 17, 2025, 11:38 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:52:36PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> 
> If a CPU is missing a policy then the unit test is skipped for the rest
> of the CPUs on the system.
> 
> Instead just skip the rest of that test and continue to test the rest
> of them.

Along with this change, does it make sense to only loop over the
online CPUs instead of possible CPUs ?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index 028527a0019ca..b888a5877ad93 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@  static int amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		if (!policy)
-			break;
+			continue;
 		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
 
 		if (get_shared_mem()) {
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@  static int amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		if (!policy)
-			break;
+			continue;
 		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
 
 		if (!((policy->cpuinfo.max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&