diff mbox series

[v2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add crypto engine

Message ID 20250221-x1e80100-crypto-v2-1-413ecf68dcd7@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series [v2] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add crypto engine | expand

Commit Message

Abel Vesa Feb. 21, 2025, 1:07 p.m. UTC
On X Elite, there is a crypto engine IP block similar to ones found on
SM8x50 platforms.

Describe the crypto engine and its BAM.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
The dt-binding schema update for the x1e80100 compatible is here
(already picked up):

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250213-dt-bindings-qcom-qce-x1e80100-v1-1-d17ef73a1c12@linaro.org/
---
Changes in v2:
- Added EE and channels numbers in BAM node, like Stephan suggested.
- Added v1.7.4 compatible as well.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250213-x1e80100-crypto-v1-1-f93afdd4025a@linaro.org
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)


---
base-commit: d4b0fd87ff0d4338b259dc79b2b3c6f7e70e8afa
change-id: 20250213-x1e80100-crypto-18c7d14cd459

Best regards,

Comments

Stephan Gerhold Feb. 24, 2025, 3:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 03:07:03PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On X Elite, there is a crypto engine IP block similar to ones found on
> SM8x50 platforms.
> 
> Describe the crypto engine and its BAM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---
> The dt-binding schema update for the x1e80100 compatible is here
> (already picked up):
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250213-dt-bindings-qcom-qce-x1e80100-v1-1-d17ef73a1c12@linaro.org/
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added EE and channels numbers in BAM node, like Stephan suggested.
> - Added v1.7.4 compatible as well.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250213-x1e80100-crypto-v1-1-f93afdd4025a@linaro.org
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> index 9d38436763432892ceef95daf0335d4cf446357c..71d5f5eed4511030a51fb12e453f603d294080cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> @@ -3708,6 +3708,38 @@ pcie4_phy: phy@1c0e000 {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> +		cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.4", "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
> +			reg = <0 0x01dc4000 0 0x28000>;
> +
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 272 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> +			#dma-cells = <1>;
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
> +				 <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
> +
> +			qcom,ee = <0>;
> +			qcom,num-ees = <7>;
> +			num-channels = <30>;

Hm, the hardware registers report the same as SM8550 on my X1E CRD:

			qcom,num-ees = <4>;
			num-channels = <20>;

[   17.679161] bam-dma-engine 1dc4000.dma-controller: bam_init() ees 4
[   17.679163] bam-dma-engine 1dc4000.dma-controller: bam_init() num-channels 20
[   17.679164] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   17.679165] bam-dma-engine 1dc4000.dma-controller: DT specifies num-channels = <30>, but hardware reports 20. Please fix the device tree!
[   17.679175] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 121 at drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c:498 bam_init+0x10c/0x150 [bam_dma]

(You don't have this warning yet, it's part of an upcoming bam_dma patch
 series from me that will start validating the num-channels given in the
 device tree.)

> +			qcom,controlled-remotely;
> +		};
> +
> +		crypto: crypto@1dfa000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-qce", "qcom,sm8150-qce", "qcom,qce";
> +			reg = <0 0x01dfa000 0 0x6000>;
> +
> +			interconnects = <&aggre2_noc MASTER_CRYPTO QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
> +			interconnect-names = "memory";
> +
> +			dmas = <&cryptobam 4>, <&cryptobam 5>;
> +			dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
> +				 <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;

iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0x1> seems to work fine for me, can you try
again? Not sure if this is related, but make sure to apply

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250208223112.142567-1-caleb.connolly@linaro.org/

since that can easily cause crashes for bam_dma. I added this diff for
testing and it's working fine so far:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
index afb8bd3b6a94..bac3d6a38055 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
@@ -3732,8 +3732,7 @@ cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
 
 			#dma-cells = <1>;
 
-			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
-				 <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
+			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0x1>;
 
 			qcom,ee = <0>;
 			qcom,num-ees = <4>;
@@ -3752,8 +3751,7 @@ crypto: crypto@1dfa000 {
 			dmas = <&cryptobam 4>, <&cryptobam 5>;
 			dma-names = "rx", "tx";
 
-			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
-				 <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
+			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0x1>;
 		};
 
 		tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {

Thanks,
Stephan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
index 9d38436763432892ceef95daf0335d4cf446357c..71d5f5eed4511030a51fb12e453f603d294080cc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
@@ -3708,6 +3708,38 @@  pcie4_phy: phy@1c0e000 {
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.4", "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
+			reg = <0 0x01dc4000 0 0x28000>;
+
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 272 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+
+			#dma-cells = <1>;
+
+			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
+				 <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
+
+			qcom,ee = <0>;
+			qcom,num-ees = <7>;
+			num-channels = <30>;
+			qcom,controlled-remotely;
+		};
+
+		crypto: crypto@1dfa000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-qce", "qcom,sm8150-qce", "qcom,qce";
+			reg = <0 0x01dfa000 0 0x6000>;
+
+			interconnects = <&aggre2_noc MASTER_CRYPTO QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
+					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
+			interconnect-names = "memory";
+
+			dmas = <&cryptobam 4>, <&cryptobam 5>;
+			dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+
+			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x480 0>,
+				 <&apps_smmu 0x481 0>;
+		};
+
 		tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
 			reg = <0 0x01f40000 0 0x20000>;