| Message ID | 20250303172508.93234-1-philmd@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | scripts/checkpatch: Fix a typo | expand |
On 3/3/25 18:25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > When running checkpatch.pl on a commit adding a file without > SPDX tag we get: > > Undefined subroutine &main::WARNING called at ./scripts/checkpatch.pl line 1694. > > The WARNING level is reported by the WARN() method. Fix the typo. > > Fixes: fa4d79c64da ("scripts: mandate that new files have SPDX-License-Identifier") > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > Possible candidate to apply on /master as buildfix buildfix: because otherwise everybody running checkpatch and adding new file without SPDX tag will have to debug checkpatch.pl. > --- > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > index 83b59fb4436..6ae9d7febee 100755 > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > @@ -1691,8 +1691,8 @@ sub process { > "'SPDX-License-Identifer'"); > } else { > # Other files MAY have SPDX license if appropriate > - WARNING("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . > - "'SPDX-License-Identifer'?"); > + WARN("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . > + "'SPDX-License-Identifer'?"); > } > } > $expect_spdx = 1;
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes: > On 3/3/25 18:25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> When running checkpatch.pl on a commit adding a file without >> SPDX tag we get: >> Undefined subroutine &main::WARNING called at ./scripts/checkpatch.pl line 1694. >> The WARNING level is reported by the WARN() method. Fix the typo. >> Fixes: fa4d79c64da ("scripts: mandate that new files have SPDX-License-Identifier") >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> >> --- >> Possible candidate to apply on /master as buildfix > > buildfix: because otherwise everybody running checkpatch and adding > new file without SPDX tag will have to debug checkpatch.pl. > >> --- >> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> index 83b59fb4436..6ae9d7febee 100755 >> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> @@ -1691,8 +1691,8 @@ sub process { >> "'SPDX-License-Identifer'"); >> } else { >> # Other files MAY have SPDX license if appropriate >> - WARNING("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . >> - "'SPDX-License-Identifer'?"); >> + WARN("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . >> + "'SPDX-License-Identifer'?"); >> } >> } >> $expect_spdx = 1; Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 83b59fb4436..6ae9d7febee 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -1691,8 +1691,8 @@ sub process { "'SPDX-License-Identifer'"); } else { # Other files MAY have SPDX license if appropriate - WARNING("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . - "'SPDX-License-Identifer'?"); + WARN("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . + "'SPDX-License-Identifer'?"); } } $expect_spdx = 1;
When running checkpatch.pl on a commit adding a file without SPDX tag we get: Undefined subroutine &main::WARNING called at ./scripts/checkpatch.pl line 1694. The WARNING level is reported by the WARN() method. Fix the typo. Fixes: fa4d79c64da ("scripts: mandate that new files have SPDX-License-Identifier") Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> --- Possible candidate to apply on /master as buildfix --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)