@@ -4364,12 +4364,10 @@ void gpiod_add_lookup_tables(struct gpiod_lookup_table **tables, size_t n)
{
unsigned int i;
- mutex_lock(&gpio_lookup_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&gpio_lookup_lock);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
list_add_tail(&tables[i]->list, &gpio_lookup_list);
-
- mutex_unlock(&gpio_lookup_lock);
}
/**
@@ -4428,11 +4426,9 @@ void gpiod_remove_lookup_table(struct gpiod_lookup_table *table)
if (!table)
return;
- mutex_lock(&gpio_lookup_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&gpio_lookup_lock);
list_del(&table->list);
-
- mutex_unlock(&gpio_lookup_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_remove_lookup_table);
There are two ways to take a lock: plain call to the mutex_lock() or using guard()() / scoped_guard(). The driver inconsistently uses both. Make taking gpio_lookup_lock consistent. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)