diff mbox series

[063/147] accel/tcg: Fix argument types of tlb_reset_dirty

Message ID 20250422192819.302784-64-richard.henderson@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series single-binary patch queue | expand

Commit Message

Richard Henderson April 22, 2025, 7:26 p.m. UTC 
The arguments to tlb_reset_dirty are host pointers.
The conversion from ram_addr_t was done in the sole
caller, tlb_reset_dirty_range_all.

Fixes: e554861766d ("exec: prepare for splitting")
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 include/exec/cputlb.h | 2 +-
 accel/tcg/cputlb.c    | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Pierrick Bouvier April 22, 2025, 8:46 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 4/22/25 12:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The arguments to tlb_reset_dirty are host pointers.
> The conversion from ram_addr_t was done in the sole
> caller, tlb_reset_dirty_range_all.
> 
> Fixes: e554861766d ("exec: prepare for splitting")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>   include/exec/cputlb.h | 2 +-
>   accel/tcg/cputlb.c    | 6 +++---
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/exec/cputlb.h b/include/exec/cputlb.h
index 8125f6809c..03ed7e2165 100644
--- a/include/exec/cputlb.h
+++ b/include/exec/cputlb.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@  void tlb_unprotect_code(ram_addr_t ram_addr);
 #endif
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
-void tlb_reset_dirty(CPUState *cpu, ram_addr_t start1, ram_addr_t length);
+void tlb_reset_dirty(CPUState *cpu, uintptr_t start, uintptr_t length);
 void tlb_reset_dirty_range_all(ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t length);
 #endif
 
diff --git a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
index b2db49e305..10090067f7 100644
--- a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
+++ b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@  static inline void copy_tlb_helper_locked(CPUTLBEntry *d, const CPUTLBEntry *s)
  * We must take tlb_c.lock to avoid racing with another vCPU update. The only
  * thing actually updated is the target TLB entry ->addr_write flags.
  */
-void tlb_reset_dirty(CPUState *cpu, ram_addr_t start1, ram_addr_t length)
+void tlb_reset_dirty(CPUState *cpu, uintptr_t start, uintptr_t length)
 {
     int mmu_idx;
 
@@ -923,12 +923,12 @@  void tlb_reset_dirty(CPUState *cpu, ram_addr_t start1, ram_addr_t length)
 
         for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
             tlb_reset_dirty_range_locked(&cpu->neg.tlb.f[mmu_idx].table[i],
-                                         start1, length);
+                                         start, length);
         }
 
         for (i = 0; i < CPU_VTLB_SIZE; i++) {
             tlb_reset_dirty_range_locked(&cpu->neg.tlb.d[mmu_idx].vtable[i],
-                                         start1, length);
+                                         start, length);
         }
     }
     qemu_spin_unlock(&cpu->neg.tlb.c.lock);