diff mbox

[v29,1/9] memblock: add memblock_cap_memory_range()

Message ID 20161228043525.27420-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

AKASHI Takahiro Dec. 28, 2016, 4:35 a.m. UTC
Add memblock_cap_memory_range() which will remove all the memblock regions
except the memory range specified in the arguments. In addition, rework is
done on memblock_mem_limit_remove_map() to re-implement it using
memblock_cap_memory_range().

This function, like memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(), will not remove
memblocks with MEMMAP_NOMAP attribute as they may be mapped and accessed
later as "device memory."
See the commit a571d4eb55d8 ("mm/memblock.c: add new infrastructure to
address the mem limit issue").

This function is used, in a succeeding patch in the series of arm64 kdump
suuport, to limit the range of usable memory, or System RAM, on crash dump
kernel.
(Please note that "mem=" parameter is of little use for this purpose.)

Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
 mm/memblock.c            | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Comments

Will Deacon Jan. 10, 2017, 11:16 a.m. UTC | #1
[adding some more folks to cc]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 01:35:25PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Add memblock_cap_memory_range() which will remove all the memblock regions

> except the memory range specified in the arguments. In addition, rework is

> done on memblock_mem_limit_remove_map() to re-implement it using

> memblock_cap_memory_range().

> 

> This function, like memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(), will not remove

> memblocks with MEMMAP_NOMAP attribute as they may be mapped and accessed

> later as "device memory."

> See the commit a571d4eb55d8 ("mm/memblock.c: add new infrastructure to

> address the mem limit issue").

> 

> This function is used, in a succeeding patch in the series of arm64 kdump

> suuport, to limit the range of usable memory, or System RAM, on crash dump

> kernel.

> (Please note that "mem=" parameter is of little use for this purpose.)

> 

> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>

> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org

> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

> ---

>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +

>  mm/memblock.c            | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------

>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)


Whilst this patch looks fine to me, it would be nice if Dennis (author of
memblock_mem_limit_remove_map) or one of the mm chaps could provide an ack
before I merge it via arm64.

Thanks,

Will

> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h

> index 5b759c9acf97..fbfcacc50c29 100644

> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h

> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h

> @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_mem_size(unsigned long limit_pfn);

>  phys_addr_t memblock_start_of_DRAM(void);

>  phys_addr_t memblock_end_of_DRAM(void);

>  void memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t memory_limit);

> +void memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);

>  void memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit);

>  bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr);

>  int memblock_is_map_memory(phys_addr_t addr);

> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c

> index 7608bc305936..fea1688fef60 100644

> --- a/mm/memblock.c

> +++ b/mm/memblock.c

> @@ -1514,11 +1514,37 @@ void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)

>  			      (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);

>  }

>  

> +void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)

> +{

> +	int start_rgn, end_rgn;

> +	int i, ret;

> +

> +	if (!size)

> +		return;

> +

> +	ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,

> +						&start_rgn, &end_rgn);

> +	if (ret)

> +		return;

> +

> +	/* remove all the MAP regions */

> +	for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= end_rgn; i--)

> +		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))

> +			memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);

> +

> +	for (i = start_rgn - 1; i >= 0; i--)

> +		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))

> +			memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);

> +

> +	/* truncate the reserved regions */

> +	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, 0, base);

> +	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved,

> +			base + size, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);

> +}

> +

>  void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)

>  {

> -	struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;

>  	phys_addr_t max_addr;

> -	int i, ret, start_rgn, end_rgn;

>  

>  	if (!limit)

>  		return;

> @@ -1529,19 +1555,7 @@ void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)

>  	if (max_addr == (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX)

>  		return;

>  

> -	ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, max_addr, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX,

> -				&start_rgn, &end_rgn);

> -	if (ret)

> -		return;

> -

> -	/* remove all the MAP regions above the limit */

> -	for (i = end_rgn - 1; i >= start_rgn; i--) {

> -		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&type->regions[i]))

> -			memblock_remove_region(type, i);

> -	}

> -	/* truncate the reserved regions */

> -	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, max_addr,

> -			      (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);

> +	memblock_cap_memory_range(0, max_addr);

>  }

>  

>  static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr)

> -- 

> 2.11.0

> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Dennis Chen Jan. 11, 2017, 1:57 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:16:18AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> [adding some more folks to cc]

> 

> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 01:35:25PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:

> > Add memblock_cap_memory_range() which will remove all the memblock regions

> > except the memory range specified in the arguments. In addition, rework is

> > done on memblock_mem_limit_remove_map() to re-implement it using

> > memblock_cap_memory_range().

> > 

> > This function, like memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(), will not remove

> > memblocks with MEMMAP_NOMAP attribute as they may be mapped and accessed

> > later as "device memory."

> > See the commit a571d4eb55d8 ("mm/memblock.c: add new infrastructure to

> > address the mem limit issue").

> > 

> > This function is used, in a succeeding patch in the series of arm64 kdump

> > suuport, to limit the range of usable memory, or System RAM, on crash dump

> > kernel.

> > (Please note that "mem=" parameter is of little use for this purpose.)

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>

> > Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org

> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

> > ---

> >  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +

> >  mm/memblock.c            | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------

> >  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

> 

> Whilst this patch looks fine to me, it would be nice if Dennis (author of

> memblock_mem_limit_remove_map) or one of the mm chaps could provide an ack

> before I merge it via arm64.

>

Will feel free to add
Acked-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>


Thanks,
Dennis
> 

> Thanks,

> 

> Will

> 

> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h

> > index 5b759c9acf97..fbfcacc50c29 100644

> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h

> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h

> > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_mem_size(unsigned long limit_pfn);

> >  phys_addr_t memblock_start_of_DRAM(void);

> >  phys_addr_t memblock_end_of_DRAM(void);

> >  void memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t memory_limit);

> > +void memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);

> >  void memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit);

> >  bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr);

> >  int memblock_is_map_memory(phys_addr_t addr);

> > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c

> > index 7608bc305936..fea1688fef60 100644

> > --- a/mm/memblock.c

> > +++ b/mm/memblock.c

> > @@ -1514,11 +1514,37 @@ void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)

> >  			      (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);

> >  }

> >  

> > +void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)

> > +{

> > +	int start_rgn, end_rgn;

> > +	int i, ret;

> > +

> > +	if (!size)

> > +		return;

> > +

> > +	ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,

> > +						&start_rgn, &end_rgn);

> > +	if (ret)

> > +		return;

> > +

> > +	/* remove all the MAP regions */

> > +	for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= end_rgn; i--)

> > +		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))

> > +			memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);

> > +

> > +	for (i = start_rgn - 1; i >= 0; i--)

> > +		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))

> > +			memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);

> > +

> > +	/* truncate the reserved regions */

> > +	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, 0, base);

> > +	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved,

> > +			base + size, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);

> > +}

> > +

> >  void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)

> >  {

> > -	struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;

> >  	phys_addr_t max_addr;

> > -	int i, ret, start_rgn, end_rgn;

> >  

> >  	if (!limit)

> >  		return;

> > @@ -1529,19 +1555,7 @@ void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)

> >  	if (max_addr == (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX)

> >  		return;

> >  

> > -	ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, max_addr, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX,

> > -				&start_rgn, &end_rgn);

> > -	if (ret)

> > -		return;

> > -

> > -	/* remove all the MAP regions above the limit */

> > -	for (i = end_rgn - 1; i >= start_rgn; i--) {

> > -		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&type->regions[i]))

> > -			memblock_remove_region(type, i);

> > -	}

> > -	/* truncate the reserved regions */

> > -	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, max_addr,

> > -			      (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);

> > +	memblock_cap_memory_range(0, max_addr);

> >  }

> >  

> >  static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr)

> > -- 

> > 2.11.0

> > 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 5b759c9acf97..fbfcacc50c29 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@  phys_addr_t memblock_mem_size(unsigned long limit_pfn);
 phys_addr_t memblock_start_of_DRAM(void);
 phys_addr_t memblock_end_of_DRAM(void);
 void memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t memory_limit);
+void memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 void memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit);
 bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr);
 int memblock_is_map_memory(phys_addr_t addr);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 7608bc305936..fea1688fef60 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1514,11 +1514,37 @@  void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
 			      (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
 }
 
+void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+{
+	int start_rgn, end_rgn;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	if (!size)
+		return;
+
+	ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,
+						&start_rgn, &end_rgn);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	/* remove all the MAP regions */
+	for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= end_rgn; i--)
+		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))
+			memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);
+
+	for (i = start_rgn - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i]))
+			memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i);
+
+	/* truncate the reserved regions */
+	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, 0, base);
+	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved,
+			base + size, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
+}
+
 void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)
 {
-	struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
 	phys_addr_t max_addr;
-	int i, ret, start_rgn, end_rgn;
 
 	if (!limit)
 		return;
@@ -1529,19 +1555,7 @@  void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit)
 	if (max_addr == (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX)
 		return;
 
-	ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, max_addr, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX,
-				&start_rgn, &end_rgn);
-	if (ret)
-		return;
-
-	/* remove all the MAP regions above the limit */
-	for (i = end_rgn - 1; i >= start_rgn; i--) {
-		if (!memblock_is_nomap(&type->regions[i]))
-			memblock_remove_region(type, i);
-	}
-	/* truncate the reserved regions */
-	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, max_addr,
-			      (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
+	memblock_cap_memory_range(0, max_addr);
 }
 
 static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr)