diff mbox

[18/21] mmc: vub300: Don't use mmc_card_present() when validating for inserted card

Message ID 1483102054-1752-19-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Ulf Hansson Dec. 30, 2016, 12:47 p.m. UTC 
The mmc_card_present() function helps the mmc core to track an internal
state of the card device. More importantly, it's not intended to be used by
mmc host drivers to check for an inserted card. Therefore, let's stop using
it and instead rely on checking for a valid pointer to a struct mmc_card,
as it should be good enough.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

---
 drivers/mmc/host/vub300.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

Comments

Linus Walleij Jan. 9, 2017, 6:24 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:

> The mmc_card_present() function helps the mmc core to track an internal

> state of the card device. More importantly, it's not intended to be used by

> mmc host drivers to check for an inserted card. Therefore, let's stop using

> it and instead rely on checking for a valid pointer to a struct mmc_card,

> as it should be good enough.

>

> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>


Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>


Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/vub300.c b/drivers/mmc/host/vub300.c
index bb3e0d1..0f49aba 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/vub300.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/vub300.c
@@ -728,8 +728,7 @@  static void vub300_deadwork_thread(struct work_struct *work)
 		 */
 	} else if (vub300->card_present) {
 		check_vub300_port_status(vub300);
-	} else if (vub300->mmc && vub300->mmc->card &&
-		   mmc_card_present(vub300->mmc->card)) {
+	} else if (vub300->mmc && vub300->mmc->card) {
 		/*
 		 * the MMC core must not have responded
 		 * to the previous indication - lets
@@ -1756,8 +1755,7 @@  static void vub300_cmndwork_thread(struct work_struct *work)
 		int data_length;
 		mutex_lock(&vub300->cmd_mutex);
 		init_completion(&vub300->command_complete);
-		if (likely(vub300->vub_name[0]) || !vub300->mmc->card ||
-		    !mmc_card_present(vub300->mmc->card)) {
+		if (likely(vub300->vub_name[0]) || !vub300->mmc->card) {
 			/*
 			 * the name of the EMPTY Pseudo firmware file
 			 * is used as a flag to indicate that the file