From patchwork Thu Mar 23 06:55:04 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiubo Li X-Patchwork-Id: 666199 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A48C6FD1D for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 06:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230428AbjCWG7u (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:59:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230350AbjCWG7r (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:59:47 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66C0A5C8 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1679554713; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wBSRjfHuOh205XUbYMBpnfnx+/h/oh1P4ynkUas+c/8=; b=aEVi4cEhBhH48mWv0SUurIQRtLIKdnlzSVs4tLP+haYxzoL6PHPdzKWJsuc+jfXz3C9ivr gcaCFAJKPjJyRSEqrkky0hMWorYSJ8y66sbW27ocfH1bUjPGfkO5bw2RXWAOxI12d7hR7h mTkuAFWGxEEVefRexiZXQPcSF1/sQ28= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-558-snSNkP5NN76uj3fv_HUVpg-1; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:58:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: snSNkP5NN76uj3fv_HUVpg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854131C075A5; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 06:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lxbceph1.gsslab.pek2.redhat.com (unknown [10.72.47.117]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8539492B01; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) From: xiubli@redhat.com To: idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jlayton@kernel.org, vshankar@redhat.com, mchangir@redhat.com, lhenriques@suse.de, Xiubo Li Subject: [PATCH v17 50/71] libceph: allow ceph_osdc_new_request to accept a multi-op read Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:55:04 +0800 Message-Id: <20230323065525.201322-51-xiubli@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230323065525.201322-1-xiubli@redhat.com> References: <20230323065525.201322-1-xiubli@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Layton Currently we have some special-casing for multi-op writes, but in the case of a read, we can't really handle it. All of the current multi-op callers call it with CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE set. Have ceph_osdc_new_request check for CEPH_OSD_FLAG_READ and if it's set, allocate multiple reply ops instead of multiple request ops. If neither flag is set, return -EINVAL. Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- net/ceph/osd_client.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c index 2dcb1140ed21..78b622178a3d 100644 --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c @@ -1136,15 +1136,30 @@ struct ceph_osd_request *ceph_osdc_new_request(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, if (flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) req->r_data_offset = off; - if (num_ops > 1) + if (num_ops > 1) { + int num_req_ops, num_rep_ops; + /* - * This is a special case for ceph_writepages_start(), but it - * also covers ceph_uninline_data(). If more multi-op request - * use cases emerge, we will need a separate helper. + * If this is a multi-op write request, assume that we'll need + * request ops. If it's a multi-op read then assume we'll need + * reply ops. Anything else and call it -EINVAL. */ - r = __ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(req, GFP_NOFS, num_ops, 0); - else + if (flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) { + num_req_ops = num_ops; + num_rep_ops = 0; + } else if (flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_READ) { + num_req_ops = 0; + num_rep_ops = num_ops; + } else { + r = -EINVAL; + goto fail; + } + + r = __ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(req, GFP_NOFS, num_req_ops, + num_rep_ops); + } else { r = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(req, GFP_NOFS); + } if (r) goto fail;