From patchwork Wed Sep 6 12:17:47 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiubo Li X-Patchwork-Id: 720649 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C61FEB8FB6 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 12:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231493AbjIFMUm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2023 08:20:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229639AbjIFMUm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2023 08:20:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98FFF10F7 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 05:19:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1694002796; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uZKt9lI2eKMSpsKvogAyk1sc6dUffx4XcKcIj6uI1IU=; b=B+0+ax5vhpoRNqJinmCR7gm173cNyj+G0dWz5fkNKrgh5bWtETtoapxQ/8Vp7/LwgqDsRd uveDMq4z16HCweWkCjZZv/C7q2rL3QHi+vkc0BLRkY/cjYzi3gUw9mCJivFvj7LoBEc+dL zHF6ERW2QjlqGHuwUZMfSCYa8hm3Ks4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-594-XCpOrwpZPFmzHbIxIzHNPA-1; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 08:19:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XCpOrwpZPFmzHbIxIzHNPA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C68800969; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 12:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from li-a71a4dcc-35d1-11b2-a85c-951838863c8d.ibm.com.com (unknown [10.72.112.106]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEA3404119; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 12:19:51 +0000 (UTC) From: xiubli@redhat.com To: idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jlayton@kernel.org, vshankar@redhat.com, mchangir@redhat.com, Xiubo Li , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ceph: remove the incorrect caps check in _file_size() Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 20:17:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20230906121747.618289-1-xiubli@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org From: Xiubo Li When truncating the inode the MDS will acquire the xlock for the ifile Locker, which will revoke the 'Frwsxl' caps from the clients. But when the client just releases and flushes the 'Fw' caps to MDS, for exmaple, and once the MDS receives the caps flushing msg it just thought the revocation has finished. Then the MDS will continue truncating the inode and then issued the truncate notification to all the clients. While just before the clients receives the cap flushing ack they receive the truncation notification, the clients will detecte that the 'issued | dirty' is still holding the 'Fw' caps. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56693 Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li --- fs/ceph/inode.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c index ea6f966dacd5..8017b9e5864f 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c @@ -769,9 +769,7 @@ int ceph_fill_file_size(struct inode *inode, int issued, ci->i_truncate_seq = truncate_seq; /* the MDS should have revoked these caps */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(issued & (CEPH_CAP_FILE_EXCL | - CEPH_CAP_FILE_RD | - CEPH_CAP_FILE_WR | + WARN_ON_ONCE(issued & (CEPH_CAP_FILE_RD | CEPH_CAP_FILE_LAZYIO)); /* * If we hold relevant caps, or in the case where we're