From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:10 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788828 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E9212BF36; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932916; cv=none; b=EcE1h00ITV0fLP+guU/DwfdbkyjKr99h94qTv8e5K6r71nqOTkm7I7vEhVR/cJjWCIo8z9+daPXTbr84q75c4xo73jRb70Dv6qiyXpU7Wz2EyX9HuYeeYbxKUQipJJ99uKRm92cKmmYhbiOp8VuXoy+DqgHZCLGHIL8BM7cUXTo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932916; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UZlhSbbgxvmCDpuKqnBh552fwklRGUKBiILYhkwfa80=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W8BchQsjafNo7V1cg9Wbcg232MgY5Yu93Q3i8kOBs2WHKQPA3iI1hkY6kKVM49wGi+20JjTgGQr7OWS0izOLIwpRXu7BmLctttiVUoe0lgG8/11FnV69O1ZwL+CLLF4cl5GO+18uhunDHiYeZegliibmM2xWLTflfuyutvsQ/1Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK3W4VpYz6J9bP; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:40:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624C81402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:41:52 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 09/18] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse When called acpi_processor_post_eject() unconditionally make a CPU not-present and unregisters it. To add support for AML events where the CPU has become disabled, but remains present, the _STA method should be checked before calling acpi_processor_remove(). Rename acpi_processor_post_eject() acpi_processor_remove_possible(), and check the _STA before calling. Adding the function prototype for arch_unregister_cpu() allows the preprocessor guards to be removed. After this change CPUs will remain registered and visible to user-space as offline if buggy firmware triggers an eject-request, but doesn't clear the corresponding _STA bits after _EJ0 has been called. Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 15d89f80857b..0403eddb3f80 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -462,16 +462,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, } /* Removal */ -static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) +static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) return; - if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device)) - return; - pr = acpi_driver_data(device); if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids) goto out; @@ -508,6 +505,29 @@ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) kfree(pr); } +static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) +{ + struct acpi_processor *pr; + unsigned long long sta; + acpi_status status; + + if (!device) + return; + + pr = acpi_driver_data(device); + if (!pr || pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids || invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) + return; + + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return; + + if (cpu_present(pr->id) && !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT)) { + acpi_processor_make_not_present(device); + return; + } +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle) {