From patchwork Mon Aug 26 21:13:53 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mario Limonciello X-Patchwork-Id: 822473 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3AF919CCF4; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724706847; cv=none; b=pnjUVvEphN6vplHhm88qX6hvrAmaM1EKn5PmMdxxt8u0l9ek5MuhpeBrD1RhNdfsyqYdxUh185zZH0Qo4pIMWzty897wAUqc3b4L/+p2nJNdvumctKRTy3EWkTs/gvDlgpvmuQJOMWi1hXCpFts4NLQmb7JASOMN8zsbjUL2bZY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724706847; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8JbbZmmWdd0t2niiYJuglfiAJbNZ1lEzfLsYW1gZrg4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=otQLl0GeG2O5A8onUJWW9ArdCVtlVKkdU25xyz91qvunzZHc9jtKLtg13TPP4kn70d6aR4gl9NoiakzJ9E23oNAfsEAMS/Pj+BH0fiOKRrIVAB0wt8lQpsc4hvxTFEQUqULAEakCEyrfQwTMxxGgE8WAuyem9ofT3yTbVxu9AS8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=brrNHkBd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="brrNHkBd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36F68C4DE0F; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724706847; bh=8JbbZmmWdd0t2niiYJuglfiAJbNZ1lEzfLsYW1gZrg4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=brrNHkBdrnvs/NQ90nEZamzQ9H1sguuseFRvNknbVoZaYgxU5m1slJqcGyw1+h/43 4fxPYHlVbJbAQm38mH549G58eOaEusi39lSIRBlf2dxgWYvApA+n/edeWbq+ZSpLzb srVkYUvkUtRW36yO2r/8qcwwC8dkCY+2RWdZ1OLOyBlfM70NcZ5VxZchjFdtBnW686 QqIKjWlyPapSu+P/yPOrIeW/edYkaieaJUxsSdEe27ASWI5cmy22qMUquziSBjJobv 9whCOOQkqUt6qmvZ7/iHbGafUkmS9uV+qWt3+nlustagGPAsqNDqC3pRp1vaSrIT0L jnGfZJHs/9I+g== From: Mario Limonciello To: Borislav Petkov , "Gautham R . Shenoy" , Perry Yuan Cc: x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)), "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)), linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI), linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK), Mario Limonciello , Perry Yuan Subject: [PATCH 3/8] ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:13:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20240826211358.2694603-4-superm1@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240826211358.2694603-1-superm1@kernel.org> References: <20240826211358.2694603-1-superm1@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mario Limonciello If the boost ratio isn't calculated properly for the system for any reason this can cause other problems that are non-obvious. Raise all messages to warn instead. Suggested-by: Perry Yuan Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy --- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c index 1d631ac5ec328..e94507110ca24 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c @@ -75,17 +75,17 @@ static void amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void) rc = cppc_get_perf_caps(0, &perf_caps); if (rc) { - pr_debug("Could not retrieve perf counters (%d)\n", rc); + pr_warn("Could not retrieve perf counters (%d)\n", rc); return; } rc = amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(0, &highest_perf); if (rc) - pr_debug("Could not retrieve highest performance\n"); + pr_warn("Could not retrieve highest performance\n"); nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; if (!nominal_perf) { - pr_debug("Could not retrieve nominal performance\n"); + pr_warn("Could not retrieve nominal performance\n"); return; } @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void) /* midpoint between max_boost and max_P */ perf_ratio = (perf_ratio + SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 1; if (!perf_ratio) { - pr_debug("Non-zero highest/nominal perf values led to a 0 ratio\n"); + pr_warn("Non-zero highest/nominal perf values led to a 0 ratio\n"); return; }