From patchwork Thu Feb 11 18:30:01 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 381098 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285EFC433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA1D64DB1 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231217AbhBKSb4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:31:56 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:63290 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231144AbhBKSar (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:30:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (HELO v370.home.net.pl) by /usr/run/smtp (/usr/run/postfix/private/idea_smtp) via UNIX with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.537) id a112a8a4c721731e; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:30:03 +0100 Received: from kreacher.localnet (89-64-80-250.dynamic.chello.pl [89.64.80.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by v370.home.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9C46661037; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:30:01 +0100 (CET) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Andy Shevchenko , Linux ACPI Cc: Mika Westerberg , LKML , Calvin Johnson , Sakari Ailus Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: property: Fix fwnode string properties matching Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: <5831274.1ZjA0VymzF@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheelgdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecujffqoffgrffnpdggtffipffknecuuegrihhlohhuthemucduhedtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepfdftrghfrggvlhculfdrucghhihsohgtkhhifdcuoehrjhifsehrjhifhihsohgtkhhirdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevudefgfeguedtjedvhfetveegleduveeuvedvjeekleefhfduhfefheekffefveenucfkphepkeelrdeigedrkedtrddvhedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepkeelrdeigedrkedtrddvhedtpdhhvghlohepkhhrvggrtghhvghrrdhlohgtrghlnhgvthdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpedftfgrfhgrvghlucflrdcuhgihshhotghkihdfuceorhhjfiesrhhjfiihshhotghkihdrnhgvtheqpdhrtghpthhtoheprghnughrihihrdhshhgvvhgthhgvnhhkoheslhhinhhugidrihhnthgvlhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdgrtghpihesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhkrgdrfigvshhtvghrsggvrhhgsehlihhnuhigrdhinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqkhgvrhhnvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthht oheptggrlhhvihhnrdhjohhhnhhsohhnsehoshhsrdhngihprdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrkhgrrhhirdgrihhluhhssehlihhnuhigrdhinhhtvghlrdgtohhm X-DCC--Metrics: v370.home.net.pl 1024; Body=12 Fuz1=12 Fuz2=12 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: Rafael J. Wysocki Property matching does not work for ACPI fwnodes if the value of the given property is not represented as a package in the _DSD package containing it. For example, the "compatible" property in the _DSD below Name (_DSD, Package () { ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package () { Package () {"compatible", "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"} } }) will not be found by fwnode_property_match_string(), because the ACPI code handling device properties does not regard the single value as a "list" in that case. Namely, fwnode_property_match_string() invoked to match a given string property value first calls fwnode_property_read_string_array() with the last two arguments equal to NULL and 0, respectively, in order to count the items in the value of the given property, with the assumption that this value may be an array. For ACPI fwnodes, that operation is carried out by acpi_node_prop_read() which calls acpi_data_prop_read() for this purpose. However, when the return (val) pointer is NULL, that function only looks for a property whose value is a package without checking the single-value case at all. To fix that, make acpi_data_prop_read() check the single-value case regardless of the return pointer value if its return pointer argument is NULL and modify acpi_data_prop_read_single() handling that case to attempt to read the value of the property if the return pointer is NULL and return 1 if that succeeds. Fixes: 3708184afc77 ("device property: Move FW type specific functionality to FW specific files") Reported-by: Calvin Johnson Cc: 4.13+ # 4.13+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -787,9 +787,6 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read_single(co const union acpi_object *obj; int ret; - if (!val) - return -EINVAL; - if (proptype >= DEV_PROP_U8 && proptype <= DEV_PROP_U64) { ret = acpi_data_get_property(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &obj); if (ret) @@ -799,28 +796,43 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read_single(co case DEV_PROP_U8: if (obj->integer.value > U8_MAX) return -EOVERFLOW; - *(u8 *)val = obj->integer.value; + + if (val) + *(u8 *)val = obj->integer.value; + break; case DEV_PROP_U16: if (obj->integer.value > U16_MAX) return -EOVERFLOW; - *(u16 *)val = obj->integer.value; + + if (val) + *(u16 *)val = obj->integer.value; + break; case DEV_PROP_U32: if (obj->integer.value > U32_MAX) return -EOVERFLOW; - *(u32 *)val = obj->integer.value; + + if (val) + *(u32 *)val = obj->integer.value; + break; default: - *(u64 *)val = obj->integer.value; + if (val) + *(u64 *)val = obj->integer.value; + break; } + + if (!val) + return 1; } else if (proptype == DEV_PROP_STRING) { ret = acpi_data_get_property(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_STRING, &obj); if (ret) return ret; - *(char **)val = obj->string.pointer; + if (val) + *(char **)val = obj->string.pointer; return 1; } else { @@ -834,7 +846,7 @@ int acpi_dev_prop_read_single(struct acp { int ret; - if (!adev) + if (!adev || !val) return -EINVAL; ret = acpi_data_prop_read_single(&adev->data, propname, proptype, val); @@ -928,10 +940,20 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read(const str const union acpi_object *items; int ret; - if (val && nval == 1) { + if (nval == 1 || !val) { ret = acpi_data_prop_read_single(data, propname, proptype, val); - if (ret >= 0) + /* + * The overflow error means that the property is there and it is + * single-value, but its type does not match, so return. + */ + if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EOVERFLOW) return ret; + + /* + * Reading this property as a single-value one failed, but its + * value may still be represented as one-element array, so + * continue. + */ } ret = acpi_data_get_property_array(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, &obj);