Message ID | 20191205143746.24873-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | dmaengine: pl330: A few system suspend/resume changes | expand |
Hi, On 05.12.2019 15:37, Ulf Hansson wrote: > It has turned out that it's in general a good idea for dmaengines to allow > DMA requests during the entire dpm_suspend() phase. Therefore, convert the > pl330 driver into using SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS. > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Works fine on various Samsung Exynos boards I have for tests. Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c > index 8e01da157518..88b884cbb7c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c > @@ -2981,7 +2981,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused pl330_resume(struct device *dev) > return ret; > } > > -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pl330_pm, pl330_suspend, pl330_resume); > +static const struct dev_pm_ops pl330_pm = { > + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pl330_suspend, pl330_resume) > +}; > > static int > pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
On 05-12-19, 15:37, Ulf Hansson wrote: > I accidentally stumbled over a couple of things for the system suspend/resume > support in the pl330 driver, that I thought deserved to be improved. So here > there are, only compile tested, so far. Applied both, thanks -- ~Vinod