From patchwork Wed Apr 20 01:40:34 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Daney X-Patchwork-Id: 66155 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.93.198 with SMTP id d64csp2184910qge; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:43:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.98.52.5 with SMTP id b5mr8563051pfa.9.1461116612368; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ss1si15169500pab.18.2016.04.19.18.43.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ashA7-0002JM-AL; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:42:39 +0000 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ash8p-0000iZ-F1 for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:41:19 +0000 Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ash8n-00071V-Il for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:41:18 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-x235.google.com with SMTP id fs9so12254660pac.2 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:40:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=ma6TSfINmWbBmdi/KOWU/aEeBgY1TKQ4JkPFR8tmPzM=; b=OKzEeh0/z1SxuJdZMAiTRfuJqHYqatvAdOoZscoBa9Mwimm8gK3fI1uqjtK5nDdhpF pL7DcQev2g4Av9PxCQMWGN7zMHbuC1PyCyH9FoAD73rQBdJ4GvinCW/TYEl6N1cRpsPg VxylE+jNIZhtbVzhAHnLp3XymGVeX8I64Ur1UxGqEBk9/WaxXfRx/QWMLC54edmBZ++x 85auf5cx2ukyzHm777G3SPmcdlg3nc+xr1w8NleRgIpUnGp0ZueiNosR1msKRsgiXXc+ J69OJ4gw1oDiRVP2ddBBTG6aPrcSUqtvgYNwdl23tJ4VMstM2ZB7cu+jwzjI/00IZjUA /e5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=ma6TSfINmWbBmdi/KOWU/aEeBgY1TKQ4JkPFR8tmPzM=; b=CwCexJr9REurmE8HrvLPIHDqGcnfVBPBf8q2dPWjkOBJgJqvT/Do4E1RnGnmbRsCTC wPutSAcj/bcz/pIO7V/IBXz3B9YhZtg1K05AWmOyJooBV6szvzRwxR/2nEK0YIDzbKWE 5qlLLu0f7oUmpaTx620XsV+UfxF/pNWLAD4LllIf2tXkHElQJwb3tGx1Dhem5UTeTcFW xOyMPttOcw/bdUJow8wtG1/g2olthe+qfAeIGA4GSPOTILpnb39y+giDS7JAlu2Y/DIg FFT8TEI5h5+wdn38y+newlqrKJqZ0zhJtOkLNfTD2YNX8MNTBWOgSP+MY5C2gns+t5RV +cAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVgN0OIhEeULilVWIT1Qul+/1aWVtj/KPlydJ92suApwFFtIqB56NwIpxAQPfUSyw== X-Received: by 10.66.194.230 with SMTP id hz6mr8636797pac.132.1461116455249; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dl.caveonetworks.com ([64.2.3.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lz5sm15480200pab.34.2016.04.19.18.40.48 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dl.caveonetworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dl.caveonetworks.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3K1elN4023075; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:40:47 -0700 Received: (from ddaney@localhost) by dl.caveonetworks.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id u3K1elbq023074; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:40:47 -0700 From: David Daney To: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , Robert Moore , Lv Zheng , Hanjun Guo , Marc Zyngier , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org Subject: [PATCH v5 09/14] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:40:34 -0700 Message-Id: <1461116439-22991-10-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.11.7 In-Reply-To: <1461116439-22991-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> References: <1461116439-22991-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160419_214117_746896_A7CF99F0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.20 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.1 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2607:f8b0:400e:c03:0:0:0:235 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ddaney.cavm[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Robert Richter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Daney MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org From: Hanjun Guo acpi_numa is default to 0, it's set to -1 when disable acpi numa or when a bad SRAT is parsed, and it's only consumed in srat_disabled() (compare it with 0) to continue parse the SRAT or not, so we don't need to set acpi_numa to 1 when we get a valid SRAT entry. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo Signed-off-by: Robert Richter Signed-off-by: David Daney --- arch/x86/mm/srat.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) -- 1.7.11.7 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c index 4217071f..30460f5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa) } set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node); node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); - acpi_numa = 1; printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u\n", pxm, apic_id, node); } @@ -101,7 +100,6 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa) set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node); node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); - acpi_numa = 1; printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%02x -> Node %u\n", pxm, apic_id, node); }