mbox series

[RESEND,0/4] Add initial support for RDP474 of IPQ5332 family

Message ID 20230601042054.29075-1-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com
Headers show
Series Add initial support for RDP474 of IPQ5332 family | expand

Message

Kathiravan Thirumoorthy June 1, 2023, 4:20 a.m. UTC
Add the initial device tree support for the Reference Design
Platform(RDP) 474 based on IPQ5332 family of SoC. This patch carries
the support for Console UART, eMMC, I2C and GPIO based buttons.

Most of the features of RDP474 is similar to RDP441, except that the
QDSP will not be used in RDP474, whereas it will be used in the RDP441.

RDP474 comes with the SoC IPQ5300, so add the SoC info support for the
same.

Corrected the RDP number in the subject, so resending it.

Kathiravan T (4):
  dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: add SoC ID for IPQ5300
  soc: qcom: socinfo: Add Soc ID for IPQ5300
  dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document MI01.9 board based on IPQ5332 family
  arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: add support for the RDP474 variant

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml         |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp474.dts   | 112 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c                    |   1 +
 include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h            |   1 +
 5 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp474.dts

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski June 1, 2023, 5:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On 01/06/2023 06:20, Kathiravan T wrote:
> Document the MI01.9 (Reference Design Platform 474) board based on IPQ5332
> family of SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 2 ++

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof