mbox series

[0/4] PCI: dwc: Add PTM sysfs support

Message ID 20250218-pcie-qcom-ptm-v1-0-16d7e480d73e@linaro.org
Headers show
Series PCI: dwc: Add PTM sysfs support | expand

Message

Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay Feb. 18, 2025, 2:36 p.m. UTC
Hi,

This series adds sysfs support for PCIe PTM in Synopsys Designware IPs.

First patch moves the common DWC struct definitions (dwc_pcie_vsec_id) to
include/pci/pcie-dwc.h from dwc-pcie-pmu driver. This allows reusing the same
definitions in pcie-designware-sysfs driver introduced in this series and also
in the debugfs series by Shradha [1].

Second patch adds support for searching the Vendor Specific Extended Capability
(VSEC) in the pcie-designware driver. This patch was originally based on
Shradha's patch [2], but modified to accept 'struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id' to avoid
iterating through the vsec_ids in the driver.

Third patch adds the actual sysfs support for PTM in a new file
pcie-designware-sysfs.c built along with pcie-designware.c.

Finally, fourth patch masks the PTM_UPDATING interrupt in the pcie-qcom-ep
driver to avoid processing the interrupt for each PTM context update.

Testing
=======

This series is tested on Qcom SA8775p Ride Mx platform where one SA8775p acts as
RC and another as EP with following instructions:

RC
--

$ echo 1 > /sys/devices/platform/1c10000.pcie/dwc/ptm/ptm_context_valid

EP
--

$ echo auto > /sys/devices/platform/1c10000.pcie-ep/dwc/ptm/ptm_context_update

$ cat /sys/devices/platform/1c10000.pcie-ep/dwc/ptm/ptm_local_clock
159612570424

$ cat /sys/devices/platform/1c10000.pcie-ep/dwc/ptm/ptm_master_clock
159609466232

$ cat /sys/devices/platform/1c10000.pcie-ep/dwc/ptm/ptm_t1
159609466112

$ cat /sys/devices/platform/1c10000.pcie-ep/dwc/ptm/ptm_t4
159609466518

NOTE: To make use of the PTM feature, the host PCIe client driver has to call
'pci_enable_ptm()' API during probe. This series was tested with enabling PTM in
the MHI host driver with a local change (which will be upstreamed later).
Technically, PTM could also be enabled in the pci_endpoint_test driver, but I
didn't add the change as I'm not sure we'd want to add random PCIe features in
the test driver without corresponding code in pci-epf-test driver.

Merging Strategy
================

I'd like to have an ACK from the perf maintainers to take the whole series
through PCI tree.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20250214105007.97582-1-shradha.t@samsung.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20250214105007.97582-2-shradha.t@samsung.com

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
      perf/dwc_pcie: Move common DWC struct definitions to 'pcie-dwc.h'
      PCI: dwc: Add helper to find the Vendor Specific Extended Capability (VSEC)
      PCI: dwc: Add sysfs support for PTM
      PCI: qcom-ep: Mask PTM_UPDATING interrupt

 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-dwc-pcie  |  70 ++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                        |   2 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile                |   2 +-
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c    |   3 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c  |   4 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-sysfs.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c       |  46 ++++
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h       |  22 ++
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c          |   8 +
 drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c                        |  23 +-
 include/linux/pcie-dwc.h                           |  42 ++++
 11 files changed, 478 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
change-id: 20250218-pcie-qcom-ptm-bf6952f5c4e5

Best regards,

Comments

Manivannan Sadhasivam Feb. 19, 2025, 7:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:31:02PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 08:06:40PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Since these are common to all Desginware PCIe IPs, move them to a new
> > header, 'pcie-dwc.h' so that other drivers could make use of them.
> 
> Which drivers are going to use it? Please provide an explanation.
> 

I can certainly add reference as 'upcoming pcie-designware-sysfs' driver.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS                 |  1 +
> >  drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 23 ++---------------------
> >  include/linux/pcie-dwc.h    | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 896a307fa065..b4d09d52a750 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -18123,6 +18123,7 @@ S:	Maintained
> >  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml
> >  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml
> >  F:	drivers/pci/controller/dwc/*designware*
> > +F:	include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> >  
> >  PCI DRIVER FOR TI DRA7XX/J721E
> >  M:	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> > index cccecae9823f..05b37ea7cf16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/errno.h>
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/pcie-dwc.h>
> >  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > @@ -99,26 +100,6 @@ struct dwc_pcie_dev_info {
> >  	struct list_head dev_node;
> >  };
> >  
> > -struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id {
> > -	u16 vendor_id;
> > -	u16 vsec_id;
> > -	u8 vsec_rev;
> > -};
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * VSEC IDs are allocated by the vendor, so a given ID may mean different
> > - * things to different vendors.  See PCIe r6.0, sec 7.9.5.2.
> > - */
> > -static const struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_ids[] = {
> > -	{ .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ALIBABA,
> > -	  .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> > -	{ .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMPERE,
> > -	  .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> > -	{ .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM,
> > -	  .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> > -	{} /* terminator */
> > -};
> > -
> >  static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
> >  					 struct device_attribute *attr,
> >  					 char *buf)
> > @@ -529,7 +510,7 @@ static void dwc_pcie_unregister_pmu(void *data)
> >  
> >  static u16 dwc_pcie_des_cap(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> > -	const struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id *vid;
> > +	const struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id *vid;
> >  	u16 vsec;
> >  	u32 val;
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h b/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..261ae11d75a4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Alibaba Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2025 Linaro Ltd.
> > + * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H
> > +#define LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> > +
> > +struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id {
> > +	u16 vendor_id;
> > +	u16 vsec_id;
> > +	u8 vsec_rev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * VSEC IDs are allocated by the vendor, so a given ID may mean different
> > + * things to different vendors.  See PCIe r6.0, sec 7.9.5.2.
> > + */
> > +static const struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_ids[] = {
> 
> Having it in the header means that there are going to be several
> copies of this data. Is that expected?
> 

Yes. I wanted to consolidate these ids in a single file to make it easy to track
them. Otherwise, these are spread across different subsystems, making it harder
to maintain.

- Mani