Message ID | cover.1617143113.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Enable power management for ufs wlun | expand |
On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote: > During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are > already suspended and so are the queues associated with them. > But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun > during its runtime-suspend. > During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in > suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never > comes out of it. > The commit > (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended) > adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter(). > > Call trace: > __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4 > __schedule+0x478/0x764 > schedule+0x9c/0xe0 > blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228 > blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4 > blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70 > __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4 > ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4 > ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c > ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154 > ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20 > pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c > __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4 > rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614 > rpm_idle+0x158/0x228 > pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac > process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470 > worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8 > kthread+0x13c/0x320 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > > Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and > registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a > supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun > suspends after all the consumers and resumes after > hba resumes. > > Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> > --- Looks good but still doesn't seem to based on the latest tree. Also came across the issue below: <SNIP> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > +static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev) > +{ > + ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev); This turned out to be wrong. This is a PM op and SCSI has already quiesced the sdev's. All that is needed is: __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM); > + return 0; > +} > +#endif
On 3/31/2021 11:19 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote: >> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are >> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them. >> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun >> during its runtime-suspend. >> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in >> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never >> comes out of it. >> The commit >> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended) >> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter(). >> >> Call trace: >> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4 >> __schedule+0x478/0x764 >> schedule+0x9c/0xe0 >> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228 >> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4 >> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70 >> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4 >> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4 >> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c >> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154 >> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20 >> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c >> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4 >> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614 >> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228 >> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac >> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470 >> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8 >> kthread+0x13c/0x320 >> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >> >> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and >> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a >> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun >> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after >> hba resumes. >> >> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> >> --- > Hi Adrian Thanks for the comments. > Looks good but still doesn't seem to based on the latest tree. > Umm, it's based on the below: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git Branch: refs/heads/for-next The top most change is e27f3c8 on 27th March'21. Which tree are you referring to that'd be latest? > Also came across the issue below: > > <SNIP> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> +static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev); > > This turned out to be wrong. This is a PM op and SCSI has already > quiesced the sdev's. All that is needed isOk. I'll fix it in the next version. > > __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM); > >> + return 0; >> +} >> +#endif
On 1/04/21 4:40 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote: > On 3/31/2021 11:19 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote: >>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are >>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them. >>> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun >>> during its runtime-suspend. >>> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in >>> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never >>> comes out of it. >>> The commit >>> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended) >>> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter(). >>> >>> Call trace: >>> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4 >>> __schedule+0x478/0x764 >>> schedule+0x9c/0xe0 >>> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228 >>> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4 >>> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70 >>> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4 >>> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4 >>> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c >>> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154 >>> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20 >>> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c >>> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4 >>> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614 >>> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228 >>> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac >>> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470 >>> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8 >>> kthread+0x13c/0x320 >>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>> >>> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and >>> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a >>> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun >>> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after >>> hba resumes. >>> >>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >> > Hi Adrian > Thanks for the comments. >> Looks good but still doesn't seem to based on the latest tree. >> > Umm, it's based on the below: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git > Branch: refs/heads/for-next > > The top most change is e27f3c8 on 27th March'21. > Which tree are you referring to that'd be latest? Dunno, but that seems to be missing: commit aa53f580e67b49ec5f4d9bd1de81eb9eb0dc079f Author: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue Feb 23 21:36:47 2021 -0800 scsi: ufs: Minor adjustments to error handling which is in v5.12-rc3 > >> Also came across the issue below: >> >> <SNIP> >> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >>> +static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev); >> >> This turned out to be wrong. This is a PM op and SCSI has already >> quiesced the sdev's. All that is needed isOk. I'll fix it in the next version. > >> >> __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM); >> >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> +#endif > >