Message ID | cover.1617893198.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Enable power management for ufs wlun | expand |
On 9/04/21 5:27 am, Daejun Park wrote: > Hi Asutosh Das, > >> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are >> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them. >> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun >> during its runtime-suspend. >> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in >> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never >> comes out of it. >> The commit >> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended) >> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter(). >> >> Call trace: >> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4 >> __schedule+0x478/0x764 >> schedule+0x9c/0xe0 >> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228 >> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4 >> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70 >> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4 >> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4 >> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c >> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154 >> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20 >> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c >> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4 >> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614 >> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228 >> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac >> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470 >> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8 >> kthread+0x13c/0x320 >> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >> >> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and >> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a >> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun >> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after >> hba resumes. >> >> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c | 2 + >> drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c | 2 + >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c | 6 +- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h | 2 +- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 2 + >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-hisi.c | 2 + >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 12 +- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 2 + >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_bsg.c | 6 +- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pci.c | 36 +-- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 642 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 + >> include/trace/events/ufs.h | 20 ++ >> 13 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-) > > In this patch, you changed pm_runtime_{get, put}_sync to scsi_autopm_{get, put}_device. > But, scsi_autopm_get_device() calls pm_runtime_put_sync() in case of error > of pm_runtime_get_sync(). So, pm_runtime_put_sync() can be called twice if > scsi_autopm_get_device has error. Also it might be tidy to make wrappers e.g. static inline int ufshcd_rpm_get_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba) { return pm_runtime_get_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); } static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put(struct ufs_hba *hba) { return pm_runtime_put(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); } static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba) { return pm_runtime_put_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); } And also consider matching: e.g. pm_runtime_put(hba->dev) to ufshcd_rpm_put(hba) pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev) to ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba)
On 4/9/2021 3:07 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 9/04/21 5:27 am, Daejun Park wrote: >> Hi Asutosh Das, >> >>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are >>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them. >>> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun >>> during its runtime-suspend. >>> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in >>> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never >>> comes out of it. >>> The commit >>> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended) >>> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter(). >>> >>> Call trace: >>> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4 >>> __schedule+0x478/0x764 >>> schedule+0x9c/0xe0 >>> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228 >>> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4 >>> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70 >>> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4 >>> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4 >>> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c >>> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154 >>> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20 >>> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c >>> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4 >>> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614 >>> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228 >>> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac >>> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470 >>> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8 >>> kthread+0x13c/0x320 >>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>> >>> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and >>> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a >>> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun >>> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after >>> hba resumes. >>> >>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c | 2 + >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c | 2 + >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c | 6 +- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h | 2 +- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 2 + >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-hisi.c | 2 + >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 12 +- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 2 + >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_bsg.c | 6 +- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pci.c | 36 +-- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 642 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 + >>> include/trace/events/ufs.h | 20 ++ >>> 13 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-) >> >> In this patch, you changed pm_runtime_{get, put}_sync to scsi_autopm_{get, put}_device. >> But, scsi_autopm_get_device() calls pm_runtime_put_sync() in case of error >> of pm_runtime_get_sync(). So, pm_runtime_put_sync() can be called twice if >> scsi_autopm_get_device has error. > > Also it might be tidy to make wrappers e.g. > > static inline int ufshcd_rpm_get_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > return pm_runtime_get_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); > } > > static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > return pm_runtime_put(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); > } > > static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > return pm_runtime_put_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); > } > > And also consider matching: e.g. > > pm_runtime_put(hba->dev) to ufshcd_rpm_put(hba) > pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev) to ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba) > > > Ok, I'll push the changes shortly. -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 9/04/21 8:15 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote: > On 4/9/2021 3:07 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 9/04/21 5:27 am, Daejun Park wrote: >>> Hi Asutosh Das, >>> >>>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are >>>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them. >>>> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun >>>> during its runtime-suspend. >>>> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in >>>> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never >>>> comes out of it. >>>> The commit >>>> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended) >>>> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter(). >>>> >>>> Call trace: >>>> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4 >>>> __schedule+0x478/0x764 >>>> schedule+0x9c/0xe0 >>>> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228 >>>> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4 >>>> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70 >>>> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4 >>>> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4 >>>> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c >>>> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154 >>>> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20 >>>> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c >>>> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4 >>>> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614 >>>> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228 >>>> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac >>>> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470 >>>> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8 >>>> kthread+0x13c/0x320 >>>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>>> >>>> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and >>>> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a >>>> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun >>>> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after >>>> hba resumes. >>>> >>>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c | 2 + >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c | 2 + >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c | 6 +- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h | 2 +- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 2 + >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-hisi.c | 2 + >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 12 +- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 2 + >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_bsg.c | 6 +- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pci.c | 36 +-- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 642 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 + >>>> include/trace/events/ufs.h | 20 ++ >>>> 13 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-) >>> >>> In this patch, you changed pm_runtime_{get, put}_sync to scsi_autopm_{get, put}_device. >>> But, scsi_autopm_get_device() calls pm_runtime_put_sync() in case of error >>> of pm_runtime_get_sync(). So, pm_runtime_put_sync() can be called twice if >>> scsi_autopm_get_device has error. >> >> Also it might be tidy to make wrappers e.g. >> >> static inline int ufshcd_rpm_get_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> { >> return pm_runtime_get_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); >> } >> static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> { >> return pm_runtime_put(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); >> } >> >> static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> { >> return pm_runtime_put_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev); >> } >> >> And also consider matching: e.g. >> >> pm_runtime_put(hba->dev) to ufshcd_rpm_put(hba) >> pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev) to ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba) >> >> >> > > Ok, I'll push the changes shortly. > I think I will have some more comments, so you could wait if you want.