| Message ID | 20230806-xiaomi-star-v1-2-0c384e8b5737@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add initial support for Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra | expand |
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> 于2023年8月6日周日 04:11写道： >On 05/08/2023 19:03, Xilin Wu via B4 Relay wrote: >> From: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@gmail.com> >> >> Add support for Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra. This commit brings support for: >> * Front and rear display panels (initialized by bootloader) >> * USB >> * UFS >> * PCIe0 >> * Thermistor sensors >> * ADSP/CDSP/Modem/SLPI >> * IR Transmitter >> * RTC provided by PMK8350 >> * Buttons >> > >... > > >> +/* >> + * Delete following upstream (sm8350.dtsi) reserved >> + * memory mappings which are different on this device. > > >> + */ >> +/delete-node/ &pil_adsp_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_slpi_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_cdsp_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_ipa_fw_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_ipa_gsi_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_gpu_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_spss_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_modem_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &rmtfs_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &pil_trustedvm_mem; >> +/delete-node/ &removed_mem; >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra"; >> + compatible = "xiaomi,star", "qcom,sm8350"; >> + chassis-type = "handset"; >> + >> + chosen { >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + ranges; >> + >> + framebuffer0: framebuffer-front@ea600000 { > >framebuffer@ > >> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer"; >> + reg = <0 0xea600000 0 (1440 * 3200 * 4)>; >> + >> + width = <1440>; >> + height = <3200>; >> + stride = <(1440 * 4)>; >> + format = "a8r8g8b8"; >> + }; >> + >> + framebuffer1: framebuffer-rear@eb79c000 { > >framebuffer@ > >> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer"; >> + reg = <0 0xeb79c000 0 (126 * 294 * 4)>; >> + >> + width = <126>; >> + height = <294>; >> + stride = <(126 * 4)>; >> + format = "a8r8g8b8"; >> + }; >> + }; >> + > Will fix in v2. > > >> + reg = <0 0x86100000 0 0x3900000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> + >> + pil_slpi_mem: memory@89a00000 { >> + reg = <0 0x89a00000 0 0x2f00000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> + >> + pil_cdsp_mem: memory@8c900000 { >> + reg = <0 0x8c900000 0 0x1e00000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> + >> + pil_ipa_fw_mem: memory@8e700000 { >> + reg = <0 0x8e700000 0 0x10000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> + >> + pil_ipa_gsi_mem: memory@8e710000 { >> + reg = <0 0x8e710000 0 0xa000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> + > >... > >> +&pm8350c_gpios { >> + gpio-line-names = "VDD_BOOST_5V_EN", >> + "NC", >> + "OTG_OVP_EN", >> + "WL_TXON", >> + "NC", >> + "NC", >> + "NC", >> + "NC", >> + "NC"; >> +}; >> + >> +&pmk8350_adc_tm { >> + status = "okay"; >> + >> + pm8350-skin-therm@0 { > >Hm, didn't we change the node names to generic "channel" and started >using labels? At least in next or ongoing patches? Or was it only for VADC? I thought it was only for VADC. "channel" is not used in binding as well.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml index 450f616774e0..af69d05ae44a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml @@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sm8350-mtp - sony,pdx214-generic - sony,pdx215-generic + - xiaomi,star - const: qcom,sm8350 - items: