| Message ID | 20230624-sm6125-dpu-v1-10-1d5a638cebf2@somainline.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS/DPU hardware and enable Sony Xperia 10 II panel | expand |
On 24/06/2023 02:41, Marijn Suijten wrote: > Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. > > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml > index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660 > + - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125 If there is going to be next version: Should be rather ordered alphanumeric, so before 660. Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On 24/06/2023 03:41, Marijn Suijten wrote: > Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. > > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml > index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660 > + - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125 Should we start using standard scheme, so "qcom,sm6125-dsi-phy-14nm" ? > - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953
On 24/06/2023 15:48, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 24/06/2023 03:41, Marijn Suijten wrote: >> Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml >> index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: >> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm >> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 >> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660 >> + - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125 > > Should we start using standard scheme, so "qcom,sm6125-dsi-phy-14nm" ? I guess the earlier the better. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660 + - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125 - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953 reg:
Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)