Message ID | 20240711052734.1273652-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers | expand |
Hi Easwar, On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/, > fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that > the approved verbiage exists in the specification. > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Acked-by: Zhi Wang <zhiwang@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7017.c | 14 ++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ivch.c | 16 +++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ns2501.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_sil164.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_tfp410.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 22 +++++++------- > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 20 ++++++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c | 14 ++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 30 +++++++++---------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.c | 28 ++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.h | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c | 2 +- > 18 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) it's a complex/long patch and I want to make sure there are no subtle errors. I will submit another round of tests and if it convinces me, I will take it in. The failures you see[*] are definitely not related to this patch, but better safe safe safe than sorry sorry sorry :-) Thanks, Andi [*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131867/
Hi Easwar, merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks! On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/, > fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that > the approved verbiage exists in the specification. > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> I realized after pushing that this had the tag: Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Not a big deal, but it's still a minor mistake. Andi
On 7/22/2024 5:50 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Easwar, > > merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks! > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" >> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/, >> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that >> the approved verbiage exists in the specification. >> >> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > I realized after pushing that this had the tag: > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Not a big deal, but it's still a minor mistake. > > Andi Thank you for the merge, Andi! I'm missing what the mistake is, I added the tags as I got them. Was I supposed to drop the R-B when Rodrigo gave an A-B? Thanks, Easwar
Hi Easwar, On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 09:15:08AM -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > On 7/22/2024 5:50 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi Easwar, > > > > merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks! > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > >> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/, > >> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that > >> the approved verbiage exists in the specification. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > > I realized after pushing that this had the tag: > > > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > > Not a big deal, but it's still a minor mistake. > > > > Andi > > Thank you for the merge, Andi! I'm missing what the mistake is, I added > the tags as I got them. Was I supposed to drop the R-B when Rodrigo gave > an A-B? Sorry, it's not yours, it's mine. I should have checked more carefully the tag section before pushing. You did everything right. The dim tool (drm maintianers tool) picked up all the tags added and I missed the double tag. This was more a message for Rodrigo, in case he wanted to fix it, but I guess no one will complain about. Thanks a lot for your work and effort! Andi
On 7/10/2024 10:27 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/, > fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that > the approved verbiage exists in the specification. > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> > --- > .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atomfirmware.c | 8 +++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c | 10 +++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_i2c.c | 8 +++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_i2c.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c | 20 ++++++------- > .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/bios/bios_parser.c | 2 +- > .../drm/amd/display/dc/bios/bios_parser2.c | 2 +- > .../drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_exports.c | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_i2c.c | 4 +-- > .../display/include/grph_object_ctrl_defs.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atombios.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h | 26 ++++++++--------- > .../powerplay/hwmgr/vega20_processpptables.c | 4 +-- > .../amd/pm/powerplay/inc/smu11_driver_if.h | 2 +- > .../inc/pmfw_if/smu11_driver_if_arcturus.h | 2 +- > .../inc/pmfw_if/smu11_driver_if_navi10.h | 2 +- > .../pmfw_if/smu11_driver_if_sienna_cichlid.h | 2 +- > .../inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_aldebaran.h | 2 +- > .../inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h | 2 +- > .../inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h | 2 +- > .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/arcturus_ppt.c | 4 +-- > .../amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/sienna_cichlid_ppt.c | 8 +++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios.h | 16 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_i2c.c | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 28 +++++++++---------- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c | 10 +++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h | 6 ++-- > 28 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) > Hi Alex, Christian, Xinhui, David, Daniel, others This is the only patch in the series not merged into a tree. Is something needed from me to move this forward? Thanks, Easwar