mbox series

[v1,00/11] pinctrl: aw9523: number of cleanups

Message ID 20240313235422.180075-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Headers show
Series pinctrl: aw9523: number of cleanups | expand

Message

Andy Shevchenko March 13, 2024, 11:52 p.m. UTC
Just noticed that the newly introduced driver has some leftovers or unneeded
customisation. Hence this series. It may (or may not :-) be sent as an update
after v6.9-rc1 for v6.9 cycle, but TBH there is nothing functional critical.

Andy Shevchenko (11):
  pinctrl: aw9523: Destroy mutex on ->remove()
  pinctrl: aw9523: Use correct error code for not supported
    functionality
  pinctrl: aw9523: Always try both ports in aw9523_gpio_set_multiple()
  pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and
    PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION()
  pinctrl: aw9523: Use temporary variable for HW IRQ number
  pinctrl: aw9523: Get rid of redundant ' & U8_MAX' pieces
  pinctrl: aw9523: Remove unused irqchip field in struct aw9523_irq
  pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of dev_err_probe()
  pinctrl: aw9523: Sort headers and group pinctrl/*
  pinctrl: aw9523: Fix indentation in a few places
  pinctrl: aw9523: Remove redundant dependency to OF

 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig          |   2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c | 132 +++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

Comments

Linus Walleij March 28, 2024, 9:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:54 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just noticed that the newly introduced driver has some leftovers or unneeded
> customisation. Hence this series. It may (or may not :-) be sent as an update
> after v6.9-rc1 for v6.9 cycle, but TBH there is nothing functional critical.

There is some speling mistake making patch 4 fail according to kernelbot,
if you rebase on v6.9-rc1 and fix patch 4 I think I can just apply the lot.

Thanks!
Linus Walleij
Andy Shevchenko March 28, 2024, 2:14 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:22 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:54 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just noticed that the newly introduced driver has some leftovers or unneeded
> > customisation. Hence this series. It may (or may not :-) be sent as an update
> > after v6.9-rc1 for v6.9 cycle, but TBH there is nothing functional critical.
>
> There is some speling mistake making patch 4 fail according to kernelbot,
> if you rebase on v6.9-rc1 and fix patch 4 I think I can just apply the lot.

Yeah, I will do it soon.