@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_add_group(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, const char *name,
int *pins, int num_pins, void *data)
{
struct group_desc *group;
- int selector;
+ int selector, error;
if (!name)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -653,7 +653,9 @@ int pinctrl_generic_add_group(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, const char *name,
group->num_pins = num_pins;
group->data = data;
- radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_group_tree, selector, group);
+ error = radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_group_tree, selector, group);
+ if (error)
+ return error;
pctldev->num_groups++;
pinctrl_generic_add_group() doesn't check the result of radix_tree_insert() despite they both may return a negative error code. Linus Walleij said he has copied the radix tree code from kernel/irq/ where the functions calling radix_tree_insert() are *void* themselves; I think it makes more sense to propagate the errors from radix_tree_insert() upstream if we can do that... Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace static analysis tool. Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> --- drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)