| Message ID | 20220120185853.24266-1-arzamas-16@mail.ee |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | i2c: mediatek: remove mt6577 support | expand |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:58:51PM +0300, Boris Lysov wrote: > This small patch series removes mt6577 support from the i2c-mt65xx driver and > devicectree binding documentation. > > The existing i2c-mt65xx driver relies on DMA since it was first introduced. > mt6577 does not support DMA [1] for I2C and SoC's Generic DMA engine cannot > be used for this purpose, too, which makes this particular driver incompatible > with mt6577 and other similar SoCs with same I2C IP. Qii Wang, what do you think about this series? > > [1] see references in > https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2021-October/030333.html > > Boris Lysov (2): > dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mt65xx: remove compatibility with mt6577 > i2c: mediatek: remove compatibility with mt6577 > > .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt | 9 +++--- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 28 +++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 >
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:09:42 +0100 Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:19:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:58:51PM +0300, Boris Lysov wrote: > > > This small patch series removes mt6577 support from the i2c-mt65xx driver > > > and devicectree binding documentation. > > > > > > The existing i2c-mt65xx driver relies on DMA since it was first > > > introduced. mt6577 does not support DMA [1] for I2C and SoC's Generic DMA > > > engine cannot be used for this purpose, too, which makes this particular > > > driver incompatible with mt6577 and other similar SoCs with same I2C IP. > > > > Qii Wang, what do you think about this series? > > This series makes sense to me. If you do not disagree, Qii Wang, I will > apply it soon. All the best, everyone. Hello! I'm kindly pinging you on this series. Has it been applied?