mbox series

[V4,0/3] Add Hynitron cstxxx Touchscreen

Message ID 20221028202636.14341-1-macroalpha82@gmail.com
Headers show
Series Add Hynitron cstxxx Touchscreen | expand

Message

Chris Morgan Oct. 28, 2022, 8:26 p.m. UTC
From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>

This series adds support for the Hynitron cstxxx (specifically
the cst3xx series). The cst3xx supports 5 point multitouch with
hardware tracking of touch points.

Note that a datasheet was unavailable for this device, so it was
built based on vendor provided source code that was tagged as GPLv2.
Some of the register functions were discovered via trial and error
and labelled as such.

Changes from V3:
 - Removed of includes and changed from of_device_get_match_data() to
   device_get_match_data().
 - Print checkcode read from the device in the event of an error.
 - Removed extra dev_err() print functions.

Changes from V2:
 - Fix issue identified by Intel Kernel Test Robot. Changed functions
   in driver to static. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

Changes from V1:
 - Updated binding to specify cst340 instead of generic cst3xx.
 - Defined various registers and commands to enhance code readability.
 - Changed name of chip specific struct to hynitron_ts_chip_data.
 - Removed unused and redundant values from driver data.
 - Switch to gpiod cansleep functions in reset.
 - Refactored read/write i2c functions.
 - Changed variable names of ret to err in certain functions and added
   additional error handling in input registration function.

Chris Morgan (3):
  dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add Hynitron vendor prefix
  dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: Add Hynitron cstxxx
  input/touchscreen: Add Hynitron cstxxx touchscreen

 .../input/touchscreen/hynitron,cstxxx.yaml    |  65 +++
 .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
 drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig             |  12 +
 drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile            |   1 +
 drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c   | 505 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 585 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/hynitron,cstxxx.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c

Comments

Dmitry Torokhov Oct. 28, 2022, 8:35 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Chris,

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 03:26:36PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
> 
> Add support for the Hynitron cst3xx controller found on devices such
> as the Anbernic RG353P and RG353V (the Hynitron CST340). This driver
> was built from sources provided by Hynitron to Anbernic (possibly
> via Rockchip as an intermediary) and marked as GPLv2 in the code.
> This driver was written strictly for the cst3xx series, but in
> most places was left somewhat generic so support could be easily
> added to other devices in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig           |  12 +
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile          |   1 +
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c | 505 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 518 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> index dc90a3ea51ee..46b158c04c7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> @@ -422,6 +422,18 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_HYCON_HY46XX
>  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
>  	  module will be called hycon-hy46xx.
>  
> +config TOUCHSCREEN_HYNITRON_CSTXXX
> +	tristate "Hynitron touchscreen support"
> +	depends on I2C
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you have a touchscreen using a Hynitron
> +	  touchscreen controller.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +
> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> +	  module will be called hynitron-cstxxx.
> +
>  config TOUCHSCREEN_ILI210X
>  	tristate "Ilitek ILI210X based touchscreen"
>  	depends on I2C
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> index 557f84fd2075..43860ca19b98 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_EXC3000)	+= exc3000.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_FUJITSU)	+= fujitsu_ts.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_GOODIX)	+= goodix_ts.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_HIDEEP)	+= hideep.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_HYNITRON_CSTXXX)	+= hynitron_cstxxx.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ILI210X)	+= ili210x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ILITEK)	+= ilitek_ts_i2c.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_IMAGIS)	+= imagis.o
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ca39e8a775b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/hynitron_cstxxx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + *  Driver for Hynitron cstxxx Touchscreen
> + *
> + *  Copyright (c) 2022 Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
> + *
> + *  This code is based on hynitron_core.c authored by Hynitron.
> + *  Note that no datasheet was available, so much of these registers
> + *  are undocumented. This is essentially a cleaned-up version of the
> + *  vendor driver with support removed for hardware I cannot test and
> + *  device-specific functions replated with generic functions wherever
> + *  possible.
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>

For the future: "asm" goes after "linux".

> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/input/mt.h>
> +#include <linux/input/touchscreen.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +/* Per chip data */
> +struct hynitron_ts_chip_data {
> +	unsigned int max_touch_num;
> +	u32 ic_chkcode;
> +	int (*firmware_info)(struct i2c_client *client);
> +	int (*bootloader_enter)(struct i2c_client *client);
> +	int (*init_input)(struct i2c_client *client);
> +	void (*report_touch)(struct i2c_client *client);
> +};
> +
> +/* Data generic to all (supported and non-supported) controllers. */
> +struct hynitron_ts_data {
> +	const struct hynitron_ts_chip_data *pdata;
> +	struct i2c_client *client;
> +	struct input_dev *input_dev;
> +	struct touchscreen_properties prop;
> +	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> +	struct gpio_desc *irq_gpio;

I do not believe irq_gpio is used so I'll drop it.

> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Since I have no datasheet, these values are guessed and/or assumed
> + * based on observation and testing.
> + */
> +#define CST3XX_FIRMWARE_INFO_START_CMD		0x01d1
> +#define CST3XX_FIRMWARE_INFO_END_CMD		0x09d1
> +#define CST3XX_FIRMWARE_CHK_CODE_REG		0xfcd1
> +#define CST3XX_FIRMWARE_VERSION_REG		0x08d2
> +#define CST3XX_FIRMWARE_VER_INVALID_VAL		0xa5a5a5a5
> +
> +#define CST3XX_BOOTLDR_PROG_CMD			0xaa01a0
> +#define CST3XX_BOOTLDR_PROG_CHK_REG		0x02a0
> +#define CST3XX_BOOTLDR_CHK_VAL			0xac
> +
> +#define CST3XX_TOUCH_DATA_PART_REG		0x00d0
> +#define CST3XX_TOUCH_DATA_FULL_REG		0x07d0
> +#define CST3XX_TOUCH_DATA_CHK_VAL		0xab
> +#define CST3XX_TOUCH_DATA_TOUCH_VAL		0x03
> +#define CST3XX_TOUCH_DATA_STOP_CMD		0xab00d0
> +#define CST3XX_TOUCH_COUNT_MASK			GENMASK(6, 0)
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * Hard coded reset delay value of 20ms not IC dependent in
> + * vendor driver.
> + */
> +static void hyn_reset_proc(struct i2c_client *client, int delay)
> +{
> +	struct hynitron_ts_data *ts_data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_data->reset_gpio, 1);
> +	mdelay(20);
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_data->reset_gpio, 0);
> +	if (delay)
> +		mdelay(delay);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t hyn_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct i2c_client *client = dev_id;
> +	struct hynitron_ts_data *ts_data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> +	ts_data->pdata->report_touch(client);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The vendor driver would retry twice before failing to read or write
> + * to the i2c device.
> + */
> +
> +static int cst3xx_i2c_write(struct i2c_client *client,
> +			    unsigned char *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	int retries = 0;
> +
> +	while (retries < 2) {
> +		ret = i2c_master_send(client, buf, len);
> +		if (ret == len)
> +			return 0;
> +		if (ret <= 0)
> +			retries++;
> +		else
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +static int cst3xx_i2c_read_register(struct i2c_client *client, u16 reg,
> +				    u8 *val, u16 len)
> +{
> +	__le16 buf = cpu_to_le16(reg);
> +	struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
> +		{
> +			.addr = client->addr,
> +			.flags = 0,
> +			.len = 2,
> +			.buf = (u8 *)&buf,
> +		},
> +		{
> +			.addr = client->addr,
> +			.flags = I2C_M_RD,
> +			.len = len,
> +			.buf = val,
> +		}
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, 2);

ARRAY_SIZE() instead of 2 is better here.

> +	if (ret >= 0)
> +		ret = (ret == ARRAY_SIZE(msgs) ? 0 : -EIO);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(&client->dev,
> +			"Error reading %d bytes from 0x%04x: %d\n",
> +			len, reg, ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int cst3xx_firmware_info(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct hynitron_ts_data *ts_data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 tmp;
> +	unsigned char buf[4];
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Tests suggest this command needed to read firmware regs.
> +	 */
> +	put_unaligned_le16(CST3XX_FIRMWARE_INFO_START_CMD, buf);
> +	ret = cst3xx_i2c_write(client, buf, 2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return -EIO;

I do not think we should be overriding errors returned by
cst3xx_i2c_write() and friends.

I'll update on my end, no need to resubmit.

Thanks.
Chris Morgan Oct. 28, 2022, 9:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:14:11PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 03:26:36PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > +static void hyn_reset_proc(struct i2c_client *client, int delay)
> > +{
> > +	struct hynitron_ts_data *ts_data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > +
> > +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_data->reset_gpio, 1);
> > +	mdelay(20);
> > +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_data->reset_gpio, 0);
> > +	if (delay)
> > +		mdelay(delay);
> 
> Just wanted to ask - you do not really want to spin for 20+ msecs here,
> right? I think changing mdelay() to msleep()/usleep() should be OK
> throughout the driver...

I just tested changing all instances of mdelay to msleep and msleep works
just fine. Do you want me to resubmit or can you change that as well?

Thank you.

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry
Dmitry Torokhov Oct. 29, 2022, 5:43 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 04:43:16PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:14:11PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 03:26:36PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > > +static void hyn_reset_proc(struct i2c_client *client, int delay)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct hynitron_ts_data *ts_data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > > +
> > > +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_data->reset_gpio, 1);
> > > +	mdelay(20);
> > > +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_data->reset_gpio, 0);
> > > +	if (delay)
> > > +		mdelay(delay);
> > 
> > Just wanted to ask - you do not really want to spin for 20+ msecs here,
> > right? I think changing mdelay() to msleep()/usleep() should be OK
> > throughout the driver...
> 
> I just tested changing all instances of mdelay to msleep and msleep works
> just fine. Do you want me to resubmit or can you change that as well?

No need. I made a few additional changes and applied. Please take a look
in my 'next' branch and yell if something is wrong.

Thanks.