diff mbox series

[02/13] ALSA: hda_intel: Use always-managed version of pcim_intx()

Message ID 20241015185124.64726-3-pstanner@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series Remove implicit devres from pci_intx() | expand

Commit Message

Philipp Stanner Oct. 15, 2024, 6:51 p.m. UTC
pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed through
devres. To remove this hybrid nature from pci_intx(), it is necessary to
port users to either an always-managed or a never-managed version.

hda_intel enables its PCI-Device with pcim_enable_device(). Thus, it needs
the always-managed version.

Replace pci_intx() with pcim_intx().

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
---
 sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Philipp Stanner Oct. 24, 2024, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 17:03 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:50:09 +0200,
> Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 16:08 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:51:12 +0200,
> > > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed
> > > > through
> > > > devres. To remove this hybrid nature from pci_intx(), it is
> > > > necessary to
> > > > port users to either an always-managed or a never-managed
> > > > version.
> > > > 
> > > > hda_intel enables its PCI-Device with pcim_enable_device().
> > > > Thus,
> > > > it needs
> > > > the always-managed version.
> > > > 
> > > > Replace pci_intx() with pcim_intx().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > index b4540c5cd2a6..b44ca7b6e54f 100644
> > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int azx_acquire_irq(struct azx
> > > > *chip,
> > > > int do_disconnect)
> > > >  	}
> > > >  	bus->irq = chip->pci->irq;
> > > >  	chip->card->sync_irq = bus->irq;
> > > > -	pci_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > +	pcim_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > Hm, it's OK-ish to do this as it's practically same as what
> > > pci_intx()
> > > currently does.  But, the current code can be a bit inconsistent
> > > about
> > > the original intx value.  pcim_intx() always stores !enable to
> > > res->orig_intx unconditionally, and it means that the orig_intx
> > > value
> > > gets overridden at each time pcim_intx() gets called.
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Meanwhile, HD-audio driver does release and re-acquire the
> > > interrupt
> > > after disabling MSI when something goes wrong, and pci_intx()
> > > call
> > > above is a part of that procedure.  So, it can rewrite the
> > > res->orig_intx to another value by retry without MSI.  And after
> > > the
> > > driver removal, it'll lead to another state.
> > 
> > I'm not sure that I understand this paragraph completely. Still,
> > could
> > a solution for the driver on the long-term just be to use
> > pci_intx()?
> 
> pci_intx() misses the restore of the original value, so it's no
> long-term solution, either.

Sure that is missing – I was basically asking whether the driver could
live without that feature.

Consider that point obsolete, see below

> 
> What I meant is that pcim_intx() blindly assumes the negative of the
> passed argument as the original state, which isn't always true.  e.g.
> when the driver calls it twice with different values, a wrong value
> may be remembered.

Ah, I see – thoguh the issue is when it's called several times with the
*same* value, isn't it?

E.g.

pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is remembered as the old value
pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is falsely remembered as the old value

Also, it would seem that calling the function for the first time like
that:

pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // old value: 1

is at least incorrect, because INTx should be 0 per default, shouldn't
it? Could then even be a 1st class bug, because INTx would end up being
enabled despite having been disabled all the time.

> 
> That said, I thought of something like below.

At first glance that looks like a good idea to me, thanks for working
this out!

IMO you can submit that as a patch so we can discuss it separately.

Greetings,
Philipp

> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 
> -- 8< --
> --- a/drivers/pci/devres.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/devres.c
> @@ -438,8 +438,17 @@ static void pcim_intx_restore(struct device
> *dev, void *data)
>  	__pcim_intx(pdev, res->orig_intx);
>  }
>  
> -static struct pcim_intx_devres *get_or_create_intx_devres(struct
> device *dev)
> +static void save_orig_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
> +	u16 pci_command;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_command);
> +	res->orig_intx = !(pci_command & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static struct pcim_intx_devres *get_or_create_intx_devres(struct
> pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct pcim_intx_devres *res;
>  
>  	res = devres_find(dev, pcim_intx_restore, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -447,8 +456,10 @@ static struct pcim_intx_devres
> *get_or_create_intx_devres(struct device *dev)
>  		return res;
>  
>  	res = devres_alloc(pcim_intx_restore, sizeof(*res),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (res)
> +	if (res) {
> +		save_orig_intx(pdev);
>  		devres_add(dev, res);
> +	}
>  
>  	return res;
>  }
> @@ -467,11 +478,10 @@ int pcim_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable)
>  {
>  	struct pcim_intx_devres *res;
>  
> -	res = get_or_create_intx_devres(&pdev->dev);
> +	res = get_or_create_intx_devres(pdev);
>  	if (!res)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	res->orig_intx = !enable;
>  	__pcim_intx(pdev, enable);
>  
>  	return 0;
>
Takashi Iwai Oct. 24, 2024, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:02:59 +0200,
Philipp Stanner wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 17:03 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:50:09 +0200,
> > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 16:08 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:51:12 +0200,
> > > > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed
> > > > > through
> > > > > devres. To remove this hybrid nature from pci_intx(), it is
> > > > > necessary to
> > > > > port users to either an always-managed or a never-managed
> > > > > version.
> > > > > 
> > > > > hda_intel enables its PCI-Device with pcim_enable_device().
> > > > > Thus,
> > > > > it needs
> > > > > the always-managed version.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Replace pci_intx() with pcim_intx().
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > index b4540c5cd2a6..b44ca7b6e54f 100644
> > > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int azx_acquire_irq(struct azx
> > > > > *chip,
> > > > > int do_disconnect)
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  	bus->irq = chip->pci->irq;
> > > > >  	chip->card->sync_irq = bus->irq;
> > > > > -	pci_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > > +	pcim_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Hm, it's OK-ish to do this as it's practically same as what
> > > > pci_intx()
> > > > currently does.  But, the current code can be a bit inconsistent
> > > > about
> > > > the original intx value.  pcim_intx() always stores !enable to
> > > > res->orig_intx unconditionally, and it means that the orig_intx
> > > > value
> > > > gets overridden at each time pcim_intx() gets called.
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Meanwhile, HD-audio driver does release and re-acquire the
> > > > interrupt
> > > > after disabling MSI when something goes wrong, and pci_intx()
> > > > call
> > > > above is a part of that procedure.  So, it can rewrite the
> > > > res->orig_intx to another value by retry without MSI.  And after
> > > > the
> > > > driver removal, it'll lead to another state.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure that I understand this paragraph completely. Still,
> > > could
> > > a solution for the driver on the long-term just be to use
> > > pci_intx()?
> > 
> > pci_intx() misses the restore of the original value, so it's no
> > long-term solution, either.
> 
> Sure that is missing – I was basically asking whether the driver could
> live without that feature.
> 
> Consider that point obsolete, see below
> 
> > 
> > What I meant is that pcim_intx() blindly assumes the negative of the
> > passed argument as the original state, which isn't always true.  e.g.
> > when the driver calls it twice with different values, a wrong value
> > may be remembered.
> 
> Ah, I see – thoguh the issue is when it's called several times with the
> *same* value, isn't it?
> 
> E.g.
> 
> pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is remembered as the old value
> pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is falsely remembered as the old value
> 
> Also, it would seem that calling the function for the first time like
> that:
> 
> pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // old value: 1
> 
> is at least incorrect, because INTx should be 0 per default, shouldn't
> it? Could then even be a 1st class bug, because INTx would end up being
> enabled despite having been disabled all the time.

Yeah, and the unexpected restore can happen even with a single call of
pcim_intx(), if the driver calls it unnecessarily.

> > That said, I thought of something like below.
> 
> At first glance that looks like a good idea to me, thanks for working
> this out!
> 
> IMO you can submit that as a patch so we can discuss it separately.

Sure, I'm going to submit later.


thanks,

Takashi
Philipp Stanner Oct. 25, 2024, 8:37 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 17:43 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:02:59 +0200,
> Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 17:03 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:50:09 +0200,
> > > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 16:08 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:51:12 +0200,
> > > > > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be
> > > > > > managed
> > > > > > through
> > > > > > devres. To remove this hybrid nature from pci_intx(), it is
> > > > > > necessary to
> > > > > > port users to either an always-managed or a never-managed
> > > > > > version.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > hda_intel enables its PCI-Device with pcim_enable_device().
> > > > > > Thus,
> > > > > > it needs
> > > > > > the always-managed version.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Replace pci_intx() with pcim_intx().
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 2 +-
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > index b4540c5cd2a6..b44ca7b6e54f 100644
> > > > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int azx_acquire_irq(struct azx
> > > > > > *chip,
> > > > > > int do_disconnect)
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > >  	bus->irq = chip->pci->irq;
> > > > > >  	chip->card->sync_irq = bus->irq;
> > > > > > -	pci_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > > > +	pcim_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hm, it's OK-ish to do this as it's practically same as what
> > > > > pci_intx()
> > > > > currently does.  But, the current code can be a bit
> > > > > inconsistent
> > > > > about
> > > > > the original intx value.  pcim_intx() always stores !enable
> > > > > to
> > > > > res->orig_intx unconditionally, and it means that the
> > > > > orig_intx
> > > > > value
> > > > > gets overridden at each time pcim_intx() gets called.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Meanwhile, HD-audio driver does release and re-acquire the
> > > > > interrupt
> > > > > after disabling MSI when something goes wrong, and pci_intx()
> > > > > call
> > > > > above is a part of that procedure.  So, it can rewrite the
> > > > > res->orig_intx to another value by retry without MSI.  And
> > > > > after
> > > > > the
> > > > > driver removal, it'll lead to another state.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure that I understand this paragraph completely.
> > > > Still,
> > > > could
> > > > a solution for the driver on the long-term just be to use
> > > > pci_intx()?
> > > 
> > > pci_intx() misses the restore of the original value, so it's no
> > > long-term solution, either.
> > 
> > Sure that is missing – I was basically asking whether the driver
> > could
> > live without that feature.
> > 
> > Consider that point obsolete, see below
> > 
> > > 
> > > What I meant is that pcim_intx() blindly assumes the negative of
> > > the
> > > passed argument as the original state, which isn't always true. 
> > > e.g.
> > > when the driver calls it twice with different values, a wrong
> > > value
> > > may be remembered.
> > 
> > Ah, I see – thoguh the issue is when it's called several times with
> > the
> > *same* value, isn't it?
> > 
> > E.g.
> > 
> > pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is remembered as the old value
> > pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is falsely remembered as the old value
> > 
> > Also, it would seem that calling the function for the first time
> > like
> > that:
> > 
> > pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // old value: 1
> > 
> > is at least incorrect, because INTx should be 0 per default,
> > shouldn't
> > it? Could then even be a 1st class bug, because INTx would end up
> > being
> > enabled despite having been disabled all the time.
> 
> Yeah, and the unexpected restore can happen even with a single call
> of
> pcim_intx(), if the driver calls it unnecessarily.
> 
> > > That said, I thought of something like below.
> > 
> > At first glance that looks like a good idea to me, thanks for
> > working
> > this out!
> > 
> > IMO you can submit that as a patch so we can discuss it separately.
> 
> Sure, I'm going to submit later.

I just took a look into the old implementation of pci_intx() (there was
no pcim_intx() back then), before I started cleaning up PCI's devres.
This what it looked like before
25216afc9db53d85dc648aba8fb7f6d31f2c8731:

void pci_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable)
{
	u16 pci_command, new;

	pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_command);

	if (enable)
		new = pci_command & ~PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE;
	else
		new = pci_command | PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE;

	if (new != pci_command) {
		struct pci_devres *dr;

		pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, new);

		dr = find_pci_dr(pdev);
		if (dr && !dr->restore_intx) {
			dr->restore_intx = 1;
			dr->orig_intx = !enable;
		}
	}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_intx);

If I'm not mistaken the old version did not have the problem because
the value to be restored only changed if new != pci_command.

That should always be correct, what do you think?

If so, only my commit 25216afc9db53d85dc648aba8fb7f6d31f2c8731 needs to
be fixed.

Thanks,
P.


> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
>
Takashi Iwai Oct. 25, 2024, 8:46 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:37:57 +0200,
Philipp Stanner wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 17:43 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:02:59 +0200,
> > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 17:03 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:50:09 +0200,
> > > > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 16:08 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:51:12 +0200,
> > > > > > Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be
> > > > > > > managed
> > > > > > > through
> > > > > > > devres. To remove this hybrid nature from pci_intx(), it is
> > > > > > > necessary to
> > > > > > > port users to either an always-managed or a never-managed
> > > > > > > version.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > hda_intel enables its PCI-Device with pcim_enable_device().
> > > > > > > Thus,
> > > > > > > it needs
> > > > > > > the always-managed version.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Replace pci_intx() with pcim_intx().
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > > b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > > index b4540c5cd2a6..b44ca7b6e54f 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > > > > > > @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int azx_acquire_irq(struct azx
> > > > > > > *chip,
> > > > > > > int do_disconnect)
> > > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > >  	bus->irq = chip->pci->irq;
> > > > > > >  	chip->card->sync_irq = bus->irq;
> > > > > > > -	pci_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > > > > +	pcim_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
> > > > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hm, it's OK-ish to do this as it's practically same as what
> > > > > > pci_intx()
> > > > > > currently does.  But, the current code can be a bit
> > > > > > inconsistent
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > the original intx value.  pcim_intx() always stores !enable
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > res->orig_intx unconditionally, and it means that the
> > > > > > orig_intx
> > > > > > value
> > > > > > gets overridden at each time pcim_intx() gets called.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Meanwhile, HD-audio driver does release and re-acquire the
> > > > > > interrupt
> > > > > > after disabling MSI when something goes wrong, and pci_intx()
> > > > > > call
> > > > > > above is a part of that procedure.  So, it can rewrite the
> > > > > > res->orig_intx to another value by retry without MSI.  And
> > > > > > after
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > driver removal, it'll lead to another state.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm not sure that I understand this paragraph completely.
> > > > > Still,
> > > > > could
> > > > > a solution for the driver on the long-term just be to use
> > > > > pci_intx()?
> > > > 
> > > > pci_intx() misses the restore of the original value, so it's no
> > > > long-term solution, either.
> > > 
> > > Sure that is missing – I was basically asking whether the driver
> > > could
> > > live without that feature.
> > > 
> > > Consider that point obsolete, see below
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > What I meant is that pcim_intx() blindly assumes the negative of
> > > > the
> > > > passed argument as the original state, which isn't always true. 
> > > > e.g.
> > > > when the driver calls it twice with different values, a wrong
> > > > value
> > > > may be remembered.
> > > 
> > > Ah, I see – thoguh the issue is when it's called several times with
> > > the
> > > *same* value, isn't it?
> > > 
> > > E.g.
> > > 
> > > pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is remembered as the old value
> > > pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // 0 is falsely remembered as the old value
> > > 
> > > Also, it would seem that calling the function for the first time
> > > like
> > > that:
> > > 
> > > pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // old value: 1
> > > 
> > > is at least incorrect, because INTx should be 0 per default,
> > > shouldn't
> > > it? Could then even be a 1st class bug, because INTx would end up
> > > being
> > > enabled despite having been disabled all the time.
> > 
> > Yeah, and the unexpected restore can happen even with a single call
> > of
> > pcim_intx(), if the driver calls it unnecessarily.
> > 
> > > > That said, I thought of something like below.
> > > 
> > > At first glance that looks like a good idea to me, thanks for
> > > working
> > > this out!
> > > 
> > > IMO you can submit that as a patch so we can discuss it separately.
> > 
> > Sure, I'm going to submit later.
> 
> I just took a look into the old implementation of pci_intx() (there was
> no pcim_intx() back then), before I started cleaning up PCI's devres.
> This what it looked like before
> 25216afc9db53d85dc648aba8fb7f6d31f2c8731:
> 
> void pci_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable)
> {
> 	u16 pci_command, new;
> 
> 	pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_command);
> 
> 	if (enable)
> 		new = pci_command & ~PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE;
> 	else
> 		new = pci_command | PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE;
> 
> 	if (new != pci_command) {
> 		struct pci_devres *dr;
> 
> 		pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, new);
> 
> 		dr = find_pci_dr(pdev);
> 		if (dr && !dr->restore_intx) {
> 			dr->restore_intx = 1;
> 			dr->orig_intx = !enable;
> 		}
> 	}
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_intx);
> 
> If I'm not mistaken the old version did not have the problem because
> the value to be restored only changed if new != pci_command.
> 
> That should always be correct, what do you think?
> 
> If so, only my commit 25216afc9db53d85dc648aba8fb7f6d31f2c8731 needs to
> be fixed.

Yes, it looks so.  Fortunately my submitted patch pointed to the right
Fixes tag :)


thanks,

Takashi
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
index b4540c5cd2a6..b44ca7b6e54f 100644
--- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@  static int azx_acquire_irq(struct azx *chip, int do_disconnect)
 	}
 	bus->irq = chip->pci->irq;
 	chip->card->sync_irq = bus->irq;
-	pci_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
+	pcim_intx(chip->pci, !chip->msi);
 	return 0;
 }