From patchwork Mon Jun 27 22:14:45 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Latypov X-Patchwork-Id: 585725 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626A1CCA47B for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 22:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242492AbiF0WPA (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:15:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48600 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242452AbiF0WO6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:14:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x549.google.com (mail-pg1-x549.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::549]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D8C627E for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x549.google.com with SMTP id 134-20020a63018c000000b0040cf04213a1so5671140pgb.6 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:14:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=YG9Q3CRxjKNbFFtdimNgDK1kR2lmE0FhCvDoREvwN2w=; b=Ev/BEy571NJsSBihxqtDR7WyJeVamBhiu+FJBqdrWAfNoGUQxirzSVv5PnbF3dGZPJ gGV9pj6pfT/0r6dm7zifKoYWTEskhCZU8qYLRBYAVsokG1vH6tSqMorscQhy/sQC059E bHkfSjR1+9YPRt5oEl8F+MqyXbCZo0XxOJadeETpTTRtfeXbE/a5/sMCE+tamLKxS1XQ m450uOISq4Q3SvXq4nzLUZXaRO1WXZmXJHyF+eo8FlxT+7a4uzA670sG0m14cBPHQ/Cs 1Y/CZEswa6+xFr3eBjxpbYeflBJA+W3DfoVRQ5AMqqKDI+HSTPI4wybfXtWZ7New754C tnig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=YG9Q3CRxjKNbFFtdimNgDK1kR2lmE0FhCvDoREvwN2w=; b=vJLL1rM6NPsASjyotk2ybvThzBAmO+b+8082hWfGVDz9ruMvUcGNtUUoIJDgDYtQIA rAIPrH3jCzxs4jFY91Oy/YG9zr0Mqlheql6Foka0jdBl9BGi0kR3Md9ddS6Zs02F8S4V U29j93mcE2dOmqsjdSGoX2yRGiCiFYIoyox84VDKXxgK8A4asT3qQRFHBz8Ia5jpcgCk s4LMiPcGrXN5np1rUEw+M4J9w+bCgHsebLzl88BbZvLFcHXbv0CFlg9cZZOSCIaDNrdC RBtoaVEAri81B7lRJSmOD4SvH6V6GE/Qw4TWyIY2JMsI8xcugN5O7bumrKJO1JtRXZqr oyIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/1YfyxZzpvev6dE+rHKjDJsA4zg064AKSqnYrGvu4WZkY8Y+2+ RgBGgqJOprob3V1O02eIcdfFAvgTEs+Knw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ugAoe8vRznb1kZSClsb15VkloCeEaGT1QxvE5gF2yNx/Buew4SWd4OLK2twuQvc/jWi/5e8xhorRe2Qg== X-Received: from dlatypov-spec.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:3f35]) (user=dlatypov job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:e292:b0:16b:8e84:f230 with SMTP id o18-20020a170902e29200b0016b8e84f230mr305396plc.173.1656368096455; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 22:14:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220627221446.82157-1-dlatypov@google.com> Message-Id: <20220627221446.82157-2-dlatypov@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220627221446.82157-1-dlatypov@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] kunit: tool: make --kunitconfig repeatable, blindly concat From: Daniel Latypov To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig be repeatable [1][2]. This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g. $ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin or equivalently: $ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice. And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML coverage [2], variants of tests [3]. There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple --kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]). Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values, but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better. Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you either have to do to specify the current build_dir > --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config or > --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir, doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc. Example with conflicting values: > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin < CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n > CONFIG_KUNIT=m > EOF > ... > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig: > CONFIG_KUNIT=y > vs from /dev/stdin > CONFIG_KUNIT=m > > CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y > vs from /dev/stdin > # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins --- v1 -> v3: merge with kunitconfig refactor patch, rename differing_options() to conflicting_options() --- tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 13 ++++--- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 11 +++++- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 38 ++++++++++++------ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py index 13bd72e47da8..163f6b8ac464 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py @@ -291,8 +291,9 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None: parser.add_argument('--kunitconfig', help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests.' ' If given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig" ' - 'will get automatically appended.', - metavar='PATH') + 'will get automatically appended. If repeated, the files ' + 'blindly concatenated, which might not work in all cases.', + action='append', metavar='PATHS') parser.add_argument('--kconfig_add', help='Additional Kconfig options to append to the ' '.kunitconfig, e.g. CONFIG_KASAN=y. Can be repeated.', @@ -414,7 +415,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): if not linux: linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig, kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, arch=cli_args.arch, cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, @@ -440,7 +441,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): if not linux: linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig, kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, arch=cli_args.arch, cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, @@ -457,7 +458,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build': if not linux: linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig, kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, arch=cli_args.arch, cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, @@ -476,7 +477,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): elif cli_args.subcommand == 'exec': if not linux: linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig, kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, arch=cli_args.arch, cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py index 898b2a35eb29..48b5f34b2e5d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ from dataclasses import dataclass import re -from typing import Dict, Iterable, Set +from typing import Dict, Iterable, List, Set, Tuple CONFIG_IS_NOT_SET_PATTERN = r'^# CONFIG_(\w+) is not set$' CONFIG_PATTERN = r'^CONFIG_(\w+)=(\S+|".*")$' @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ class Kconfig: return False return True + def conflicting_options(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]]: + diff = [] # type: List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]] + for name, value in self._entries.items(): + b = other._entries.get(name) + if b and value != b: + pair = (KconfigEntry(name, value), KconfigEntry(name, b)) + diff.append(pair) + return diff + def merge_in_entries(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> None: for name, value in other._entries.items(): self._entries[name] = value diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index 4115781185e1..f65c996127c3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -176,6 +176,30 @@ def get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str: def get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str: return os.path.join(build_dir, OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH) +def get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir: str, + kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: + if not kunitconfig_paths: + path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) + if not os.path.exists(path): + shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, path) + return kunit_config.parse_file(path) + + merged = kunit_config.Kconfig() + + for path in kunitconfig_paths: + if os.path.isdir(path): + path = os.path.join(path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH) + if not os.path.exists(path): + raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({path}) does not exist') + + partial = kunit_config.parse_file(path) + diff = merged.conflicting_options(partial) + if diff: + diff_str = '\n\n'.join(f'{a}\n vs from {path}\n{b}' for a, b in diff) + raise ConfigError(f'Multiple values specified for {len(diff)} options in kunitconfig:\n{diff_str}') + merged.merge_in_entries(partial) + return merged + def get_outfile_path(build_dir: str) -> str: return os.path.join(build_dir, OUTFILE_PATH) @@ -221,7 +245,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, - kunitconfig_path='', + kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None, kconfig_add: Optional[List[str]]=None, arch=None, cross_compile=None, @@ -237,17 +261,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: if not load_config: return - if kunitconfig_path: - if os.path.isdir(kunitconfig_path): - kunitconfig_path = os.path.join(kunitconfig_path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH) - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): - raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({kunitconfig_path}) does not exist') - else: - kunitconfig_path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): - shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, kunitconfig_path) - - self._kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kunitconfig_path) + self._kconfig = get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir, kunitconfig_paths) if kconfig_add: kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string('\n'.join(kconfig_add)) self._kconfig.merge_in_entries(kconfig) diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index 0fbca18b6e65..0c5ba3ed35e6 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -356,17 +356,46 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self): with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'): - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file') + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=['/nonexistent_file']) def test_valid_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig: - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[kunitconfig.name]) def test_dir_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w'): pass - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir]) + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig(self): + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT', 'y') + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT_TEST', 'm') + + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m') + pass + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig) + + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig_invalid(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=m') + + with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, '(?s)Multiple values.*CONFIG_KUNIT'): + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + def test_kconfig_add(self): want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() @@ -637,7 +666,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], kconfig_add=None, arch='um', cross_compile=None, @@ -649,19 +678,32 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], kconfig_add=None, arch='um', cross_compile=None, qemu_config_path=None) + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') + def test_run_multiple_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): + mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--kunitconfig=other']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig', 'other'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None) + + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') def test_run_kconfig_add(self, mock_linux_init): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path=None, + kunitconfig_paths=None, kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], arch='um', cross_compile=None,