@@ -3709,7 +3709,12 @@ TEST(user_notification_sibling_pid_ns)
ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
if (pid == 0) {
- ASSERT_EQ(unshare(CLONE_NEWPID), 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(unshare(CLONE_NEWPID), 0) {
+ if (errno == EPERM)
+ SKIP(return, "CLONE_NEWPID requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN");
+ else if (errno == EINVAL)
+ SKIP(return, "CLONE_NEWPID is invalid (missing CONFIG_PID_NS?)");
+ }
pid2 = fork();
ASSERT_GE(pid2, 0);
@@ -3727,6 +3732,8 @@ TEST(user_notification_sibling_pid_ns)
ASSERT_EQ(unshare(CLONE_NEWPID), 0) {
if (errno == EPERM)
SKIP(return, "CLONE_NEWPID requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN");
+ else if (errno == EINVAL)
+ SKIP(return, "CLONE_NEWPID is invalid (missing CONFIG_PID_NS?)");
}
ASSERT_EQ(errno, 0);
unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) can return EINVAL if the kernel does not have the CONFIG_PID_NS option enabled. Add a check on these calls to skip the test if we receive EINVAL. Signed-off-by: Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)