From patchwork Thu Sep 12 23:16:35 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 828018 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com (mail-pj1-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B241CDFD1 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.42 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726183098; cv=none; b=RP6LlzYZJUBiX4x8TPGJxQvZCX4CFrvxZReGRZtL1LygSI6D6mq20b/bn/dhY7Tj9jk0tAAwco1EbO9Ebtb0Vn5x3Wdy+s0AkkqXdol8XiTZL0+DTl59YE55YMyqxboweOYv5ZPs+5Y+TftfMDQKX5j/AjTUdSDPohNXZd10DcQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726183098; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sdAIiNyyrBGM8eJVyjtjFIhtLAgMfq/m9FwE4dmDTYw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=GfR1fdeHTUa03ivDp2juzo4Ra+6usHGBJxttTq/kPEd3q5F0OXXB1yMbv9blWkncE8Qt9eVStv3M+Gkz4X0VeRY4tBCIwuKSWYdHUUhs8X9SHMFKO+9ML7hvwFFWHe6fEYt5tTFrbmqLzJAofWTH8Hj7yAo8adclDL4uk9DgX70= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=irqAYqds; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="irqAYqds" Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d87f34a650so1072122a91.1 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:18:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1726183096; x=1726787896; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LCtPR9BmJ6DODxbSJXPEMg2KBG0LhzjyQImQVuDyFoI=; b=irqAYqdst15pyNE9Ttv8SPg6L0/zVg0vMsomRQQJlK1aR2DxwdgOYmgfQbckpcb/rx PKM0I4EcGYo2MR7pRIhcBUt9aoYy/t979UGggpk4NRg+P2J5oBeyQAf5AaqQdO49EJ6y BXEmv/PvK9FyvhLy1z/bKhWQXIXuPHrBr+M5M8m4vV7e4caGKwzPjcLo2fDpcjjilGJ8 lMVQZVJvfkWxSXYoGVir/Ink6Zj4Rjt5Qyl7/EGzdF5kxayZdhnwIa92kmv6wLN4KY7D xAx4O97+UqlrYwol8v4EzKs3D2oHcdZjG+RwqtDWlolzcIwoFKFynN+gWnEHlA5Ccgcw QXpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726183096; x=1726787896; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LCtPR9BmJ6DODxbSJXPEMg2KBG0LhzjyQImQVuDyFoI=; b=nMTcs8HAchxRupxmIUyIUodrtUnzgsnNP4Xi0ufKBNna7js71Lsw1yBXVo+MpLujGP jvNy/9XjyTttIkmkeQQcoGBmC7ZPa5eQf9nR9wE62kCz/lxh8ryRpEdX5GAbw8QtTvvo rLYNpNC0BYYdUgAfWPIBzouHM9p34/3NEDuyhWGNMct3OJvHjVX2GmaR2uV91VDbPQWF wfOLe3u9UOQ7reqiCxgp76Dcd4Z0qEltFRrT5J1o1DOMu8BGGZxRjqo9VqncV18CnNj7 MQggCYhIzo1m5QYW1CaxLz/EkYw0Pxi1VgynxDuWX37fCw1kXMVSvXXbigp6JhJyT1b8 DT2w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUKX1GQfQQT5//wxM2CAL8m6blib+oj0R7Gb0UTqQ9kbhOm8zXycwauCpncq0Wh1mz0GkBIR+RkI/6Hvxg7VOE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfeT9PO3jMpvbsA0ZhYoxWPuntsfQRZEAknbnI3zfcT4Q1tJOL jT3DCraq33QD89R96uD0NmhHe2SJBDeNdRh6fuhmhU1Vj3ScBDdVbIP1LrS0f4Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGgverTQv+Xo/0N4fBcX6Yv1Oz/GCSb0qsYtm/a9zkp0fzNx4s9v8cFBlXoYng7BTWKu3muTQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c396:b0:2d8:7a63:f9c8 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2db67211ecdmr17510608a91.14.1726183095964; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2db6c1ac69asm3157591a91.0.2024.09.12.16.18.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@sifive.com, conor@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: corbet@lwn.net, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, kees@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, samuel.holland@sifive.com, debug@rivosinc.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, jerry.shih@sifive.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, anup@brainfault.org, mchitale@ventanamicro.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, sameo@rivosinc.com, bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, david@redhat.com, libang.li@antgroup.com, jszhang@kernel.org, leobras@redhat.com, guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, songshuaishuai@tinylab.org, costa.shul@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com, zong.li@sifive.com, puranjay@kernel.org, namcaov@gmail.com, antonb@tenstorrent.com, sorear@fastmail.com, quic_bjorande@quicinc.com, ancientmodern4@gmail.com, ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com, ke.zhao@shingroup.cn, sunilvl@ventanamicro.com, tanzhasanwork@gmail.com, schwab@suse.de, dawei.li@shingroup.cn, rppt@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com, osalvador@suse.de, ryan.roberts@arm.com, andrii@kernel.org, alx@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, revest@chromium.org, bgray@linux.ibm.com, deller@gmx.de, zev@bewilderbeest.net Subject: [PATCH v4 16/30] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:16:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20240912231650.3740732-17-debug@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.0 In-Reply-To: <20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com> References: <20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Userspace specifies CLONE_VM to share address space and spawn new thread. `clone` allow userspace to specify a new stack for new thread. However there is no way to specify new shadow stack base address without changing API. This patch allocates a new shadow stack whenever CLONE_VM is given. In case of CLONE_VFORK, parent is suspended until child finishes and thus can child use parent shadow stack. In case of !CLONE_VM, COW kicks in because entire address space is copied from parent to child. `clone3` is extensible and can provide mechanisms using which shadow stack as an input parameter can be provided. This is not settled yet and being extensively discussed on mailing list. Once that's settled, this commit will adapt to that. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 45 ++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 12 ++- arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h index 4fa201b4fc4e..a6974307ca6c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +struct task_struct; +struct kernel_clone_args; + #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ @@ -17,6 +20,48 @@ struct cfi_status { unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ }; +unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, + const struct kernel_clone_args *args); +void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk); +void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size); +unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size); +void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); +bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); + +#else + +static inline unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, + const struct kernel_clone_args *args) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + +} + +unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, + unsigned long size) +{ + +} + +static inline void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) +{ + +} + +static inline bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index 9b66dc07c3d2..6747db72435a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK) #include @@ -194,7 +195,8 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src) void exit_thread(struct task_struct *tsk) { - + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI)) + shstk_release(tsk); } int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args) @@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args) unsigned long clone_flags = args->flags; unsigned long usp = args->stack; unsigned long tls = args->tls; + unsigned long ssp = 0; struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p); memset(&p->thread.s, 0, sizeof(p->thread.s)); @@ -216,11 +219,18 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args) p->thread.s[0] = (unsigned long)args->fn; p->thread.s[1] = (unsigned long)args->fn_arg; } else { + /* allocate new shadow stack if needed. In case of CLONE_VM we have to */ + ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, args); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ssp)) + return PTR_ERR((void *)ssp); + *childregs = *(current_pt_regs()); /* Turn off status.VS */ riscv_v_vstate_off(childregs); if (usp) /* User fork */ childregs->sp = usp; + if (ssp) /* if needed, set new ssp */ + set_active_shstk(p, ssp); if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS) childregs->tp = tls; childregs->a0 = 0; /* Return value of fork() */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index ce002eabbdc1..7a7f0b57b2d4 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -19,6 +19,41 @@ #define SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE sizeof(void *) +bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false; +} + +void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr; + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_size = size; +} + +unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size) +{ + if (size) + *size = task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_size; + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base; +} + +void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr; +} + +/* + * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as + * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back + */ +static unsigned long calc_shstk_size(unsigned long size) +{ + if (size) + return PAGE_ALIGN(size); + + return PAGE_ALIGN(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G)); +} + /* * Writes on shadow stack can either be `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. `sspush` can happen * implicitly on current shadow stack pointed to by CSR_SSP. `ssamoswap` takes pointer to @@ -143,3 +178,89 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsi return allocate_shadow_stack(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok); } + +/* + * This gets called during clone/clone3/fork. And is needed to allocate a shadow stack for + * cases where CLONE_VM is specified and thus a different stack is specified by user. We + * thus need a separate shadow stack too. How does separate shadow stack is specified by + * user is still being debated. Once that's settled, remove this part of the comment. + * This function simply returns 0 if shadow stack are not supported or if separate shadow + * stack allocation is not needed (like in case of !CLONE_VM) + */ +unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, + const struct kernel_clone_args *args) +{ + unsigned long addr, size; + + /* If shadow stack is not supported, return 0 */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return 0; + + /* + * If shadow stack is not enabled on the new thread, skip any + * switch to a new shadow stack. + */ + if (is_shstk_enabled(tsk)) + return 0; + + /* + * For CLONE_VFORK the child will share the parents shadow stack. + * Set base = 0 and size = 0, this is special means to track this state + * so the freeing logic run for child knows to leave it alone. + */ + if (args->flags & CLONE_VFORK) { + set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); + return 0; + } + + /* + * For !CLONE_VM the child will use a copy of the parents shadow + * stack. + */ + if (!(args->flags & CLONE_VM)) + return 0; + + /* + * reaching here means, CLONE_VM was specified and thus a separate shadow + * stack is needed for new cloned thread. Note: below allocation is happening + * using current mm. + */ + size = calc_shstk_size(args->stack_size); + addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return addr; + + set_shstk_base(tsk, addr, size); + + return addr + size; +} + +void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + unsigned long base = 0, size = 0; + /* If shadow stack is not supported or not enabled, nothing to release */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(tsk)) + return; + + /* + * When fork() with CLONE_VM fails, the child (tsk) already has a + * shadow stack allocated, and exit_thread() calls this function to + * free it. In this case the parent (current) and the child share + * the same mm struct. Move forward only when they're same. + */ + if (!tsk->mm || tsk->mm != current->mm) + return; + + /* + * We know shadow stack is enabled but if base is NULL, then + * this task is not managing its own shadow stack (CLONE_VFORK). So + * skip freeing it. + */ + base = get_shstk_base(tsk, &size); + if (!base) + return; + + vm_munmap(base, size); + set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); +}