From patchwork Fri May 2 23:30:50 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 886753 Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com (mail-pl1-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF37526C385 for ; Fri, 2 May 2025 23:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.179 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746228700; cv=none; b=Quj0JKWqPdh3NOAeYEMDK2VGVo9H2B8hXbT1LjjJ9+sAtELLS7qPzzSjZinbUqDAIWnf62j4FMFejlI/VVwnN0W8moRSPnQKmHEDqU66HVXKIzTaN089lqVB8aljShkk/FFhdkGTgwh3aw5m2rHRusk61VeZUHrI/Thi5vGenKQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746228700; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DD8AZK8ySfZe7gMGHOO9A42rFShjR5wdUyvOAGK6saQ=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=V7IjG8Y2oh/iWJN1R9ENBiHGWkXZEbBZ4QJWFemUyQIybfqNT6LnV6nEItxZy7w2WjOcfvmXqYxG4ngMRjc2qk+aDMdDoG7zonTcMpBfEBGrwBVwpkv5F50F1icnU8xTIUp94PY1FJX1UQqTFTULXaJ/sGcHVBJYoi+BmGWM+js= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=uVOMRKwZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="uVOMRKwZ" Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22e09f57ed4so23272235ad.0 for ; Fri, 02 May 2025 16:31:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1746228698; x=1746833498; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Ju4eTa3aeO/W78J21C+hNLwsAKoKH1MKseai5GOrm10=; b=uVOMRKwZ/X/orDBHu3T3UIvXa26PpT1xEdgPNFm+NZZBUUrlLqI/5xx0Anj5RobIZM mB0Kba2e7tvCrhv4b7RiCTixBDpQiBSwI+McRM3Emgqfm8tFuFpKNnZyxrtdMMw8oond OsrM982J2hxQR7UF3wxydhcuYgSWZwvTvP0IC5HbxfhCSN4jrOgrKR10h5YDBdWFYOf+ Lnq2Mjut//YfssMp7nmPYk217OQ/v2Xf0DEboh/71LOxAMqm8YRXqFDeIZ4YhHNc6p6k gp8AenZ7O5RnMRVovJ9I+NoypXNOTBBupBIiRX7ycxlYdwSjEU850afakAs7xreD5Njr p+mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746228698; x=1746833498; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ju4eTa3aeO/W78J21C+hNLwsAKoKH1MKseai5GOrm10=; b=AA7dJ4sjbR/LfTbcboGKWMuZxYN3LTqA1W3y0LtsHhMcRN7mDipMTojB0zJWeoV6Pu xatofLFWIYhJk7AAbsvENxBFzKgZvOKQYy/XMGZt0wkRDmAYWykL9/nlpZMamx1nN/r+ pDPor8XwWHyKK7eMDu+9isf/SXQtrlL9wn7BVy9CBH0D4230XrJlFcFZZSKuCCBTeRFx xuBdgktiDslbAPgeyknFI0DXvRN4sMLxLj7qHTEd+RwLzCOb0pkyi3QHYqzrllU3N+bb gZinAkr0p9lBdSVW6RIWWQ7xVlqXJD7iYDckOklrWi9bak9IwzJmV0ElJOhWNNGt69hy CU9A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXuIpn1JIqRPGZLFF97HIcsf9qvAxvW51RbrTpb7XyqUyMvbXhGPsvUWk6+QhRadxITqoezLkmoL3AMS0e/X38=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyLXty29VcoLEK+kFkzARrH6UK4SEILyS/ZRWVRzSdPADuigmj8 XrHHC8rWb2LwHemX52PsE3/7NgJyaMghjQZ5pvZrntTgb7UfdMUQE4U1/cwW0oQ= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct9coMza4YBMGiuenvRcUuEN36nM8Up/22Mc5fP4e+AIJlztTidUtCzGXMz2Ph w7pcinrt/kfydrj4N04OLuI11H8dd8I6y4C5ELoUwHqQkuwc72QK+heWaOQbed+Rom2o4SiIqau n5A7qhpQd1q7skGaaKnh0qYHt3Czi63M9XmKL9URWn/783XM+bnim2dNd+t55WfG+0broNfecDW 9u5L/vJkeMAXd97qvy9XR37m/YsrYxRtG9v4YeuPHRkHlL9qcpbRxOihBn84K6xi7C+oDC3Dm6l 7TwAqdx/sqLHvhwha5HPCSMe+9TsZTfcxJpkfmplxmePEaenaiU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH40Jmn6oEiZT0umVLkqo8dVsl41YyQO4DPBkxlhpe7o3KvJQ1BRD6SebSW+AuEVdZx++vrtA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:3c47:b0:215:58be:3349 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22e1007d2bamr83923895ad.14.1746228697999; Fri, 02 May 2025 16:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-22e15228ff2sm13367055ad.180.2025.05.02.16.31.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 May 2025 16:31:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 16:30:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v15 19/27] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20250502-v5_user_cfi_series-v15-19-914966471885@rivosinc.com> References: <20250502-v5_user_cfi_series-v15-0-914966471885@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20250502-v5_user_cfi_series-v15-0-914966471885@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Jann Horn , Conor Dooley , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 Expose a new register type NT_RISCV_USER_CFI for risc-v cfi status and state. Intentionally both landing pad and shadow stack status and state are rolled into cfi state. Creating two different NT_RISCV_USER_XXX would not be useful and wastage of a note type. Enabling, disabling and locking of feature is not allowed via ptrace set interface. However setting `elp` state or setting shadow stack pointer are allowed via ptrace set interface . It is expected `gdb` might have use to fixup `elp` state or `shadow stack` pointer. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 30 ++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h index 659ea3af5680..42c3fc8bd513 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h @@ -131,6 +131,36 @@ struct __sc_riscv_cfi_state { unsigned long ss_ptr; /* shadow stack pointer */ }; +#define PTRACE_CFI_LP_EN_BIT 0 +#define PTRACE_CFI_LP_LOCK_BIT 1 +#define PTRACE_CFI_ELP_BIT 2 +#define PTRACE_CFI_SS_EN_BIT 3 +#define PTRACE_CFI_SS_LOCK_BIT 4 +#define PTRACE_CFI_SS_PTR_BIT 5 + +#define PTRACE_CFI_LP_EN_STATE (1 << PTRACE_CFI_LP_EN_BIT) +#define PTRACE_CFI_LP_LOCK_STATE (1 << PTRACE_CFI_LP_LOCK_BIT) +#define PTRACE_CFI_ELP_STATE (1 << PTRACE_CFI_ELP_BIT) +#define PTRACE_CFI_SS_EN_STATE (1 << PTRACE_CFI_SS_EN_BIT) +#define PTRACE_CFI_SS_LOCK_STATE (1 << PTRACE_CFI_SS_LOCK_BIT) +#define PTRACE_CFI_SS_PTR_STATE (1 << PTRACE_CFI_SS_PTR_BIT) + +#define PRACE_CFI_STATE_INVALID_MASK ~(PTRACE_CFI_LP_EN_STATE | \ + PTRACE_CFI_LP_LOCK_STATE | \ + PTRACE_CFI_ELP_STATE | \ + PTRACE_CFI_SS_EN_STATE | \ + PTRACE_CFI_SS_LOCK_STATE | \ + PTRACE_CFI_SS_PTR_STATE) + +struct __cfi_status { + __u64 cfi_state; +}; + +struct user_cfi_state { + struct __cfi_status cfi_status; + __u64 shstk_ptr; +}; + #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_RISCV_PTRACE_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c index ea67e9fb7a58..933a3d26d33c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include enum riscv_regset { REGSET_X, @@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ enum riscv_regset { #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM REGSET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI + REGSET_CFI, +#endif }; static int riscv_gpr_get(struct task_struct *target, @@ -184,6 +188,87 @@ static int tagged_addr_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *target, } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI +static int riscv_cfi_get(struct task_struct *target, + const struct user_regset *regset, + struct membuf to) +{ + struct user_cfi_state user_cfi; + struct pt_regs *regs; + + memset(&user_cfi, 0, sizeof(user_cfi)); + regs = task_pt_regs(target); + + if (is_indir_lp_enabled(target)) { + user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state |= PTRACE_CFI_LP_EN_STATE; + user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state |= is_indir_lp_locked(target) ? + PTRACE_CFI_LP_LOCK_STATE : 0; + user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state |= (regs->status & SR_ELP) ? + PTRACE_CFI_ELP_STATE : 0; + } + + if (is_shstk_enabled(target)) { + user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state |= (PTRACE_CFI_SS_EN_STATE | + PTRACE_CFI_SS_PTR_STATE); + user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state |= is_shstk_locked(target) ? + PTRACE_CFI_SS_LOCK_STATE : 0; + user_cfi.shstk_ptr = get_active_shstk(target); + } + + return membuf_write(&to, &user_cfi, sizeof(user_cfi)); +} + +/* + * Does it make sense to allowing enable / disable of cfi via ptrace? + * Not allowing enable / disable / locking control via ptrace for now. + * Setting shadow stack pointer is allowed. GDB might use it to unwind or + * some other fixup. Similarly gdb might want to suppress elp and may want + * to reset elp state. + */ +static int riscv_cfi_set(struct task_struct *target, + const struct user_regset *regset, + unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, + const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf) +{ + int ret; + struct user_cfi_state user_cfi; + struct pt_regs *regs; + + regs = task_pt_regs(target); + + ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, &user_cfi, 0, -1); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* + * Not allowing enabling or locking shadow stack or landing pad + * There is no disabling of shadow stack or landing pad via ptrace + * rsvd field should be set to zero so that if those fields are needed in future + */ + if ((user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state & + (PTRACE_CFI_LP_EN_STATE | PTRACE_CFI_LP_LOCK_STATE | + PTRACE_CFI_SS_EN_STATE | PTRACE_CFI_SS_LOCK_STATE)) || + (user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state & PRACE_CFI_STATE_INVALID_MASK)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* If lpad is enabled on target and ptrace requests to set / clear elp, do that */ + if (is_indir_lp_enabled(target)) { + if (user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state & + PTRACE_CFI_ELP_STATE) /* set elp state */ + regs->status |= SR_ELP; + else + regs->status &= ~SR_ELP; /* clear elp state */ + } + + /* If shadow stack enabled on target, set new shadow stack pointer */ + if (is_shstk_enabled(target) && + (user_cfi.cfi_status.cfi_state & PTRACE_CFI_SS_PTR_STATE)) + set_active_shstk(target, user_cfi.shstk_ptr); + + return 0; +} +#endif + static const struct user_regset riscv_user_regset[] = { [REGSET_X] = { .core_note_type = NT_PRSTATUS, @@ -224,6 +309,16 @@ static const struct user_regset riscv_user_regset[] = { .set = tagged_addr_ctrl_set, }, #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI + [REGSET_CFI] = { + .core_note_type = NT_RISCV_USER_CFI, + .align = sizeof(__u64), + .n = sizeof(struct user_cfi_state) / sizeof(__u64), + .size = sizeof(__u64), + .regset_get = riscv_cfi_get, + .set = riscv_cfi_set, + }, +#endif }; static const struct user_regset_view riscv_user_native_view = { diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h index 819ded2d39de..ee30dcd80901 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ typedef struct elf64_shdr { #define NT_RISCV_VECTOR 0x901 /* RISC-V vector registers */ #define NN_RISCV_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL "LINUX" #define NT_RISCV_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL 0x902 /* RISC-V tagged address control (prctl()) */ +#define NN_RISCV_USER_CFI "LINUX" +#define NT_RISCV_USER_CFI 0x903 /* RISC-V shadow stack state */ #define NN_LOONGARCH_CPUCFG "LINUX" #define NT_LOONGARCH_CPUCFG 0xa00 /* LoongArch CPU config registers */ #define NN_LOONGARCH_CSR "LINUX"