diff mbox series

[15/28] media: ti-vpe: cal: remove wait when stopping camerarx

Message ID 20210412113457.328012-16-tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series media: ti-vpe: cal: prepare for multistream support | expand

Commit Message

Tomi Valkeinen April 12, 2021, 11:34 a.m. UTC
Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset
will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to
"reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Laurent Pinchart April 18, 2021, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Tomi,

Thank you for the patch.

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

> 

> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

> ---

>  drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>  

>  static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>  {

> -	unsigned int i;

>  	int ret;

>  

>  	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>  			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

>  			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

>  

> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)


Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected
CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not
CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why
you always get a timeout.

> -			break;

> -		usleep_range(1000, 1100);

> -	}

> -	phy_dbg(3, phy, "CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(%d) = 0x%08x Complex IO in Reset (%d) %s\n",

> +	phy_dbg(3, phy, "CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(%d) = 0x%08x Complex IO in Reset\n",

>  		phy->instance,

> -		cal_read(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance)), i,

> -		(i >= 10) ? "(timeout)" : "");

> +		cal_read(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance)));

>  

>  	/* Disable the phy */

>  	cal_camerarx_disable(phy);


-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Tomi Valkeinen April 19, 2021, 11:29 a.m. UTC | #2
On 18/04/2021 15:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,

> 

> Thank you for the patch.

> 

> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

>> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

>> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

>>

>> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

>>

>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

>> ---

>>   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

>>

>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>   

>>   static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>   {

>> -	unsigned int i;

>>   	int ret;

>>   

>>   	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

>> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>   			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

>>   			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

>>   

>> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

>> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

>> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

>> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)

> 

> Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected

> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not

> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why

> you always get a timeout.


No, I don't think so. The complexio reset is set active just before the 
wait. So the reset status should show reset ongoing, until at some point 
we release the reset (we do that when starting the PHY again).

The TRM doesn't talk about this, though. So, I guess the status might go 
to RESETONGOING for a very short time and back to RESETCOMPLETED before 
the code can see the RESETONGOING. But I suspect the status just stays 
at RESETCOMPLETED.

  Tomi
Laurent Pinchart April 28, 2021, 11:57 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Tomi,

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:29:20PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 18/04/2021 15:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> >> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

> >> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

> >> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

> >>

> >> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

> >>

> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

> >> ---

> >>   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

> >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

> >>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> >> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> >> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> >>   

> >>   static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> >>   {

> >> -	unsigned int i;

> >>   	int ret;

> >>   

> >>   	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

> >> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> >>   			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

> >>   			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

> >>   

> >> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

> >> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

> >> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

> >> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

> >> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

> >> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)

> > 

> > Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected

> > CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not

> > CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why

> > you always get a timeout.

> 

> No, I don't think so. The complexio reset is set active just before the 

> wait. So the reset status should show reset ongoing, until at some point 

> we release the reset (we do that when starting the PHY again).

>

> The TRM doesn't talk about this, though. So, I guess the status might go 

> to RESETONGOING for a very short time and back to RESETCOMPLETED before 

> the code can see the RESETONGOING. But I suspect the status just stays 

> at RESETCOMPLETED.


The TRM is indeed not very clear. My understanding was that asserting
RESET_CTRL initiates the reset, and RESET_DONE switches to 1 once the
reset completes. There's however a note in the initialization sequence
that states

a. Deassert the CAMERARX reset:
i. Set CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[30] RESET_CTRL to 0x1.
CAUTION
For the CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[29] RESET_DONE bit to be set to 0x1
(reset completed), the external sensor must to be active and sending the
MIPI HS BYTECLK (that is, RXBYTECLKHS clock).

The RESET_DONE bit may thus only toggle when de-asserting the reset
signal (by setting RESET_CTRL to 1). It would be useful to test that
hypothesis by reading RESET_DONE just before setting RESET_CTRL to 1,
and right after. I'd expect the values to be 0 and 1 respectively. If
that's the case, then this patch is likely correct, so

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>



The register macros are quite confusing by the way. We have

#define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK          BIT(30)
#define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL                       0
#define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL           1

When reading the code, I thought

        cal_write_field(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),
                        CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,
                        CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK)

meant that we were setting the reset bit to 1. I would personally get
rid of the _MASK suffixes for single bits, and use 0 and 1 in the code
instead of CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL and
CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Tomi Valkeinen May 4, 2021, 7:56 a.m. UTC | #4
On 29/04/2021 02:57, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,

> 

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:29:20PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>> On 18/04/2021 15:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>>>> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

>>>> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

>>>> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

>>>>

>>>> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

>>>>

>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

>>>> ---

>>>>    drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

>>>>

>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>>>> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>>>> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>>>    

>>>>    static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>>>    {

>>>> -	unsigned int i;

>>>>    	int ret;

>>>>    

>>>>    	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

>>>> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>>>    			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

>>>>    			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

>>>>    

>>>> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

>>>> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

>>>> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

>>>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

>>>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

>>>> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)

>>>

>>> Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected

>>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not

>>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why

>>> you always get a timeout.

>>

>> No, I don't think so. The complexio reset is set active just before the

>> wait. So the reset status should show reset ongoing, until at some point

>> we release the reset (we do that when starting the PHY again).

>>

>> The TRM doesn't talk about this, though. So, I guess the status might go

>> to RESETONGOING for a very short time and back to RESETCOMPLETED before

>> the code can see the RESETONGOING. But I suspect the status just stays

>> at RESETCOMPLETED.

> 

> The TRM is indeed not very clear. My understanding was that asserting

> RESET_CTRL initiates the reset, and RESET_DONE switches to 1 once the

> reset completes. There's however a note in the initialization sequence

> that states


No, it's a bit to keep (or release) camerarx in reset. When the camerarx 
is being started, both reset ctrl and done are 0. The driver then 
releases the reset by setting ctrl to 1. Nothing happens at this time, 
as the camerarx needs the byteclk from the sensor to finish the reset. 
Later, when the sensor has been started, done changes to 1. This works fine.

The problem is on the stop side. Setting ctrl back to 0 does something, 
as the capture stops, so presumably the camerarx goes into reset state. 
But the done bit does not change.

The done bit is back to 0 when we start the camerarx again. My guess is 
that it's reset when the CAL module is turned off via runtime PM. This 
is not good, as there's no strict rule that says CAL will be turned off 
by runtime PM. However, I have not found any other way to reset the done 
bit. And in the case that we don't get a CAL reset, I guess we're still 
fine, as the camerarx is just already out of reset, and works.

  Tomi
Laurent Pinchart June 4, 2021, 1:44 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Tomi,

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:57:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:29:20PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> > On 18/04/2021 15:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> > >> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

> > >> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

> > >> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

> > >>

> > >> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

> > >>

> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

> > >> ---

> > >>   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

> > >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

> > >>

> > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> > >> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

> > >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> > >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> > >> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> > >>   

> > >>   static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> > >>   {

> > >> -	unsigned int i;

> > >>   	int ret;

> > >>   

> > >>   	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

> > >> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> > >>   			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

> > >>   			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

> > >>   

> > >> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

> > >> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

> > >> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

> > >> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

> > >> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

> > >> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)

> > > 

> > > Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected

> > > CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not

> > > CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why

> > > you always get a timeout.

> > 

> > No, I don't think so. The complexio reset is set active just before the 

> > wait. So the reset status should show reset ongoing, until at some point 

> > we release the reset (we do that when starting the PHY again).

> >

> > The TRM doesn't talk about this, though. So, I guess the status might go 

> > to RESETONGOING for a very short time and back to RESETCOMPLETED before 

> > the code can see the RESETONGOING. But I suspect the status just stays 

> > at RESETCOMPLETED.

> 

> The TRM is indeed not very clear. My understanding was that asserting

> RESET_CTRL initiates the reset, and RESET_DONE switches to 1 once the

> reset completes. There's however a note in the initialization sequence

> that states

> 

> a. Deassert the CAMERARX reset:

> i. Set CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[30] RESET_CTRL to 0x1.

> CAUTION

> For the CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[29] RESET_DONE bit to be set to 0x1

> (reset completed), the external sensor must to be active and sending the

> MIPI HS BYTECLK (that is, RXBYTECLKHS clock).

> 

> The RESET_DONE bit may thus only toggle when de-asserting the reset

> signal (by setting RESET_CTRL to 1). It would be useful to test that

> hypothesis by reading RESET_DONE just before setting RESET_CTRL to 1,

> and right after. I'd expect the values to be 0 and 1 respectively. If

> that's the case, then this patch is likely correct, so

> 

> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> 

> 

> The register macros are quite confusing by the way. We have

> 

> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK          BIT(30)

> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL                       0

> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL           1

> 

> When reading the code, I thought

> 

>         cal_write_field(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

>                         CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

>                         CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK)

> 

> meant that we were setting the reset bit to 1. I would personally get

> rid of the _MASK suffixes for single bits, and use 0 and 1 in the code

> instead of CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL and

> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL.


Do you think this would be a good idea ? It can be done in a follow-up
patch.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Tomi Valkeinen June 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m. UTC | #6
On 04/06/2021 16:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,

> 

> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:57:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:29:20PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>>> On 18/04/2021 15:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>>>>> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

>>>>> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

>>>>> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

>>>>>

>>>>> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

>>>>>

>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

>>>>> ---

>>>>>    drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

>>>>>

>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>>>>> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

>>>>> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>>>>    

>>>>>    static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>>>>    {

>>>>> -	unsigned int i;

>>>>>    	int ret;

>>>>>    

>>>>>    	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

>>>>> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

>>>>>    			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

>>>>>    			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

>>>>>    

>>>>> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

>>>>> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

>>>>> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

>>>>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

>>>>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

>>>>> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)

>>>>

>>>> Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected

>>>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not

>>>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why

>>>> you always get a timeout.

>>>

>>> No, I don't think so. The complexio reset is set active just before the

>>> wait. So the reset status should show reset ongoing, until at some point

>>> we release the reset (we do that when starting the PHY again).

>>>

>>> The TRM doesn't talk about this, though. So, I guess the status might go

>>> to RESETONGOING for a very short time and back to RESETCOMPLETED before

>>> the code can see the RESETONGOING. But I suspect the status just stays

>>> at RESETCOMPLETED.

>>

>> The TRM is indeed not very clear. My understanding was that asserting

>> RESET_CTRL initiates the reset, and RESET_DONE switches to 1 once the

>> reset completes. There's however a note in the initialization sequence

>> that states

>>

>> a. Deassert the CAMERARX reset:

>> i. Set CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[30] RESET_CTRL to 0x1.

>> CAUTION

>> For the CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[29] RESET_DONE bit to be set to 0x1

>> (reset completed), the external sensor must to be active and sending the

>> MIPI HS BYTECLK (that is, RXBYTECLKHS clock).

>>

>> The RESET_DONE bit may thus only toggle when de-asserting the reset

>> signal (by setting RESET_CTRL to 1). It would be useful to test that

>> hypothesis by reading RESET_DONE just before setting RESET_CTRL to 1,

>> and right after. I'd expect the values to be 0 and 1 respectively. If

>> that's the case, then this patch is likely correct, so

>>

>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>>

>>

>> The register macros are quite confusing by the way. We have

>>

>> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK          BIT(30)

>> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL                       0

>> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL           1

>>

>> When reading the code, I thought

>>

>>          cal_write_field(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

>>                          CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

>>                          CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK)

>>

>> meant that we were setting the reset bit to 1. I would personally get

>> rid of the _MASK suffixes for single bits, and use 0 and 1 in the code

>> instead of CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL and

>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL.

> 

> Do you think this would be a good idea ? It can be done in a follow-up

> patch.


I'd rather keep the MASK prefix as it's used for multiple bit masks too.

I think the problem here is the define for 0. The define should tell 
what the bit value does, but here it's just the field name. The value 
defines could perhaps be:

#define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_ASSERT           0
#define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_DEASSERT         1

Using just 0 or 1 may work fine at times, but often you don't know what 
they mean. You set 1 to RESET_CTRL. Does it put the IP into reset? Or 
release the reset?

Some other bits in cal_regs.h are fine, like:

#define CAL_CTRL_PWRSCPCLK_MASK			BIT(21)
#define CAL_CTRL_PWRSCPCLK_AUTO				0
#define CAL_CTRL_PWRSCPCLK_FORCE			1

But some have this same issue:

#define CAL_CTRL_POSTED_WRITES_MASK		BIT(0)
#define CAL_CTRL_POSTED_WRITES_NONPOSTED		0
#define CAL_CTRL_POSTED_WRITES				1

  Tomi
Laurent Pinchart June 9, 2021, 12:31 p.m. UTC | #7
Hi Tomi,

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 01:41:07PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 04/06/2021 16:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:57:23AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:29:20PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> >>> On 18/04/2021 15:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> >>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> >>>>> Asserting ComplexIO reset seems to affect the HW (ie. asserting reset

> >>>>> will break an active capture), but the RESET_DONE bit never changes to

> >>>>> "reset is ongoing" state. Thus we always get a timeout.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Drop the wait, as it seems to achieve nothing.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

> >>>>> ---

> >>>>>    drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 15 ++-------------

> >>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

> >>>>>

> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> >>>>> index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644

> >>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c

> >>>>> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> >>>>>    

> >>>>>    static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> >>>>>    {

> >>>>> -	unsigned int i;

> >>>>>    	int ret;

> >>>>>    

> >>>>>    	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);

> >>>>> @@ -419,19 +418,9 @@ static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)

> >>>>>    			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

> >>>>>    			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);

> >>>>>    

> >>>>> -	/* Wait for power down completion */

> >>>>> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

> >>>>> -		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,

> >>>>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

> >>>>> -				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==

> >>>>> -		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)

> >>>>

> >>>> Isn't this the wrong condition ? I would have expected

> >>>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETCOMPLETED, not

> >>>> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING. That could explain why

> >>>> you always get a timeout.

> >>>

> >>> No, I don't think so. The complexio reset is set active just before the

> >>> wait. So the reset status should show reset ongoing, until at some point

> >>> we release the reset (we do that when starting the PHY again).

> >>>

> >>> The TRM doesn't talk about this, though. So, I guess the status might go

> >>> to RESETONGOING for a very short time and back to RESETCOMPLETED before

> >>> the code can see the RESETONGOING. But I suspect the status just stays

> >>> at RESETCOMPLETED.

> >>

> >> The TRM is indeed not very clear. My understanding was that asserting

> >> RESET_CTRL initiates the reset, and RESET_DONE switches to 1 once the

> >> reset completes. There's however a note in the initialization sequence

> >> that states

> >>

> >> a. Deassert the CAMERARX reset:

> >> i. Set CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[30] RESET_CTRL to 0x1.

> >> CAUTION

> >> For the CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_j[29] RESET_DONE bit to be set to 0x1

> >> (reset completed), the external sensor must to be active and sending the

> >> MIPI HS BYTECLK (that is, RXBYTECLKHS clock).

> >>

> >> The RESET_DONE bit may thus only toggle when de-asserting the reset

> >> signal (by setting RESET_CTRL to 1). It would be useful to test that

> >> hypothesis by reading RESET_DONE just before setting RESET_CTRL to 1,

> >> and right after. I'd expect the values to be 0 and 1 respectively. If

> >> that's the case, then this patch is likely correct, so

> >>

> >> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> >>

> >>

> >> The register macros are quite confusing by the way. We have

> >>

> >> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK          BIT(30)

> >> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL                       0

> >> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL           1

> >>

> >> When reading the code, I thought

> >>

> >>          cal_write_field(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),

> >>                          CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,

> >>                          CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK)

> >>

> >> meant that we were setting the reset bit to 1. I would personally get

> >> rid of the _MASK suffixes for single bits, and use 0 and 1 in the code

> >> instead of CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL and

> >> CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_OPERATIONAL.

> > 

> > Do you think this would be a good idea ? It can be done in a follow-up

> > patch.

> 

> I'd rather keep the MASK prefix as it's used for multiple bit masks too.

> 

> I think the problem here is the define for 0. The define should tell 

> what the bit value does, but here it's just the field name. The value 

> defines could perhaps be:

> 

> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_ASSERT           0

> #define CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_DEASSERT         1

> 

> Using just 0 or 1 may work fine at times, but often you don't know what 

> they mean. You set 1 to RESET_CTRL. Does it put the IP into reset? Or 

> release the reset?


I have a small preference for dropping _MASK for single bits, but the
above is fine with me too, it's entirely up to you.

> Some other bits in cal_regs.h are fine, like:

> 

> #define CAL_CTRL_PWRSCPCLK_MASK			BIT(21)

> #define CAL_CTRL_PWRSCPCLK_AUTO				0

> #define CAL_CTRL_PWRSCPCLK_FORCE			1

> 

> But some have this same issue:

> 

> #define CAL_CTRL_POSTED_WRITES_MASK		BIT(0)

> #define CAL_CTRL_POSTED_WRITES_NONPOSTED		0

> #define CAL_CTRL_POSTED_WRITES				1


-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
index 0354f311c5d2..245c601b992c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
@@ -405,7 +405,6 @@  static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
 
 static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
 {
-	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
 	cal_camerarx_ppi_disable(phy);
@@ -419,19 +418,9 @@  static void cal_camerarx_stop(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
 			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL,
 			CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_CTRL_MASK);
 
-	/* Wait for power down completion */
-	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
-		if (cal_read_field(phy->cal,
-				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance),
-				   CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_MASK) ==
-		    CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG_RESET_DONE_RESETONGOING)
-			break;
-		usleep_range(1000, 1100);
-	}
-	phy_dbg(3, phy, "CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(%d) = 0x%08x Complex IO in Reset (%d) %s\n",
+	phy_dbg(3, phy, "CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(%d) = 0x%08x Complex IO in Reset\n",
 		phy->instance,
-		cal_read(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance)), i,
-		(i >= 10) ? "(timeout)" : "");
+		cal_read(phy->cal, CAL_CSI2_COMPLEXIO_CFG(phy->instance)));
 
 	/* Disable the phy */
 	cal_camerarx_disable(phy);