Message ID | 20241224094920.3821861-1-kever.yang@rock-chips.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | rockchip: Add rk3562 support | expand |
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:49:05 +0800, Kever Yang wrote: > rk3562 is using the same controller as rk3588. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: None > > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.example.dtb: mmc@fe310000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: ['rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc'] is too short 'rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc' is not one of ['snps,dwcmshc-sdhci', 'sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc', 'sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc', 'sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc', 'thead,th1520-dwcmshc'] 'rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3562-dwcmshc', 'rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc'] from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml# /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.example.dtb: mmc@fe310000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected) from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml# doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20241224094920.3821861-3-kever.yang@rock-chips.com The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
Hi Kever, Am Dienstag, 24. Dezember 2024, 10:49:05 CET schrieb Kever Yang: > rk3562 is using the same controller as rk3588. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: None > > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > index c3d5e0230af1..33f4288ff879 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml > @@ -14,16 +14,19 @@ properties: > compatible: > oneOf: oneOf means what the naming suggests, the compatible needs to either follow the "items", the old one means: "rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc", "rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc" or the enum below, which means "one" element from the enum list. > - items: > - - const: rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc > + - const: rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc That means, both the rk3568 and rk3588 entries in the enum below need to stay, as they represent the single-value compatibles and the items above should definitly not mention the rk3568, but instead be modified to just include the rk3562. So just modify the items above to include it: - items: - enum: - rockchip,rk3562-dwcmshc - rockchip,rk3576-dwcmshc - const: rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > - enum: > - - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc > - - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc > - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci > - sophgo,cv1800b-dwcmshc > - sophgo,sg2002-dwcmshc > - sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc > - thead,th1520-dwcmshc Heiko
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:49:03PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote: > > This patch set adds rk3562 SoC and its evb support. > > Split out patches belong to different subsystem. > > Test with GMAC, USB, PCIe, EMMC, SD Card. > > This patch set is base on the patche set for rk3576 evb1 support. > > Changes in v2: > - Update in sort order > - remove grf in cru > - Update some properties order > > Finley Xiao (2): > arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi for RK3562 Soc > arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree > > Kever Yang (15): > dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: rockchip: Add rk3562 support > dt-bindings: mmc: Add support for rk3562 eMMC > dt-bindings: mmc: rockchip-dw-mshc: Add rk3562 compatible string > dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Add bindings for rk3562 > dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: Add rk3562 compatible > dt-bindings: gpu: Add rockchip,rk3562-mali compatible > dt-bindings: watchdog: Add rk3562 compatible > dt-bindings: spi: Add rockchip,rk3562-spi compatible > dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: Add support for rk3562 > dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: add compatible for rk3562 > dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add rockchip,rk3562-pwm > dt-bindings: rockchip: pmu: Add rk3562 compatible > dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: Add rk3562 syscon compatibles > dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add rk3562 evb2 board > dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add rk3562 QoS register compatible You squezzed here like 12 different subsystems. Some of these changes suggest missing drivers. Please read basic upstreaming guide, some previous discussions and get internal rock-chips help so we want repeat basics over and over. Bindings are with drivers. Send them to respective subsystems. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:49:03PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote: > > This patch set adds rk3562 SoC and its evb support. > > Split out patches belong to different subsystem. > > Test with GMAC, USB, PCIe, EMMC, SD Card. > > This patch set is base on the patche set for rk3576 evb1 support. > I am going through patchwork and marking all your patches as changes requested. All my comments apply to each of your patches and each of your patchsets. Best regards, Krzysztof