Message ID | 20230414055502.23920-1-quic_mkshah@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Use PSCI OS initiated mode for sc7280 | expand |
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 07:55, Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com> wrote: > > A switch from OSI to PC mode is only possible if all CPUs other than the > calling one are OFF, either through a call to CPU_OFF or not yet booted. > > Currently OSI mode is enabled before power domains are created. In cases > where CPUidle states are not using hierarchical CPU topology the bail out > path tries to switch back to PC mode which gets denied by firmware since > other CPUs are online at this point and creates inconsistent state as > firmware is in OSI mode and Linux in PC mode. > > This change moves enabling OSI mode after power domains are created, > this would makes sure that hierarchical CPU topology is used before > switching firmware to OSI mode. > > Fixes: 70c179b49870 ("cpuidle: psci: Allow PM domain to be initialized even if no OSI mode") > Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 37 +++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > index c2d6d9c3c930..c3993df24eef 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > @@ -120,20 +120,6 @@ static void psci_pd_remove(void) > } > } > > -static bool psci_pd_try_set_osi_mode(void) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - if (!psci_has_osi_support()) > - return false; > - > - ret = psci_set_osi_mode(true); > - if (ret) > - return false; > - > - return true; > -} > - > static void psci_cpuidle_domain_sync_state(struct device *dev) > { > /* > @@ -152,15 +138,12 @@ static int psci_cpuidle_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > struct device_node *node; > - bool use_osi; > + bool use_osi = psci_has_osi_support(); > int ret = 0, pd_count = 0; > > if (!np) > return -ENODEV; > > - /* If OSI mode is supported, let's try to enable it. */ > - use_osi = psci_pd_try_set_osi_mode(); > - > /* > * Parse child nodes for the "#power-domain-cells" property and > * initialize a genpd/genpd-of-provider pair when it's found. > @@ -178,25 +161,29 @@ static int psci_cpuidle_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* Bail out if not using the hierarchical CPU topology. */ > if (!pd_count) > - goto no_pd; > + goto remove_pd; We should return 0 here instead, right? > > /* Link genpd masters/subdomains to model the CPU topology. */ > ret = dt_idle_pd_init_topology(np); > if (ret) > - goto remove_pd; > + goto remove_pd_topology; This looks wrong to me. Shouldn't we continue to goto the "remove_pd" label for this error path? > + > + /* let's try to enable OSI. */ > + ret = psci_set_osi_mode(use_osi); > + if (ret) > + goto remove_pd_topology; > > pr_info("Initialized CPU PM domain topology using %s mode\n", > use_osi ? "OSI" : "PC"); > return 0; > > -put_node: > - of_node_put(node); > +remove_pd_topology: > + dt_idle_pd_remove_topology(np); > remove_pd: > psci_pd_remove(); > +put_node: > + of_node_put(node); This of_node_put() should only be called if we break the "for_each_child_of_node" loop above because of an error, I think. Perhaps it's cleaner to just move this within the loop? > pr_err("failed to create CPU PM domains ret=%d\n", ret); > -no_pd: > - if (use_osi) > - psci_set_osi_mode(false); > return ret; > } > Kind regards Uffe