Message ID | 20241204144842.164178-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cpufreq/amd-pstate: Reuse and refactor code | expand |
Hello Mario, On 12/4/2024 10:37 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote: > On 12/4/2024 08:48, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote: >> Use static calls to avoid frequent MSR/shared memory system checks. >> >> Reuse existing functions amd_pstate_update_perf() and >> amd_pstate_set_epp() instead of duplicating code. >> >> Remove an unnecessary check for active mode in online and offline >> functions. >> >> Eliminate a redundant function amd_pstate_epp_offline(). >> >> Dhananjay Ugwekar (5): >> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert the amd_pstate_get/set_epp() to static >> calls >> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move the invocation of amd_pstate_update_perf() >> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Refactor amd_pstate_epp_reenable() and >> amd_pstate_epp_offline() >> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the cppc_state check in offline/online >> functions >> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Merge amd_pstate_epp_cpu_offline() and >> amd_pstate_epp_offline() >> >> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++------------------ >> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) >> > > For the patches not already reviewed: > > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Thanks! > > I'll add this to superm1/bleeding-edge. There is a small warning in the 3rd patch, how do you suggest we fix that, should I post a new version or you'll modify the patch at your end? drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c: In function 'amd_pstate_epp_offline': >> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c:1664:13: warning: variable 'value' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 1664 | u64 value; | ^~~~~ Regards, Dhananjay > > I have another series that I will build on top of it as well.