Message ID | 20250111161429.51-1-quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add EPSS L3 provider support on SA8775P SoC | expand |
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 04:14:25PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote: > Current interconnect framework is based on static IDs for creating node > and registering with framework. This becomes a limitation for topologies > where there are multiple instances of same interconnect provider. Add > icc_node_create_alloc_id() API to create icc node with dynamic id, this > will help to overcome the dependency on static IDs. > > Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/interconnect/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 6 +++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c > index 9d5404a07e8a..0b7093eb51af 100644 > --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c > @@ -858,6 +858,38 @@ struct icc_node *icc_node_create(int id) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_node_create); > > +/** > + * icc_node_create_alloc_id() - create node and dynamically allocate id > + * @start_id: min id to be allocated > + * > + * Return: icc_node pointer on success, or ERR_PTR() on error > + */ > +struct icc_node *icc_node_create_alloc_id(int start_id) By having clients pass in start_id, you distribute the decision of what a "good number" is across multiple parts of the system (or you have clients relying on getting [start_id, start_id + N) back). Wouldn't it be better to hide that choice in one place (inside the icc framework)? Regards, Bjorn > +{ > + struct icc_node *node; > + int id; > + > + mutex_lock(&icc_lock); > + > + node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!node) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + id = idr_alloc(&icc_idr, node, start_id, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (id < 0) { > + WARN(1, "%s: couldn't get idr\n", __func__); > + kfree(node); > + node = ERR_PTR(id); > + goto out; > + } > + node->id = id; > +out: > + mutex_unlock(&icc_lock); > + > + return node; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_node_create_alloc_id); > + > /** > * icc_node_destroy() - destroy a node > * @id: node id > diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h > index f5aef8784692..4fc7a5884374 100644 > --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h > +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct icc_node { > int icc_std_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw, > u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak); > struct icc_node *icc_node_create(int id); > +struct icc_node *icc_node_create_alloc_id(int start_id); > void icc_node_destroy(int id); > int icc_link_create(struct icc_node *node, const int dst_id); > void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider); > @@ -141,6 +142,11 @@ static inline struct icc_node *icc_node_create(int id) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP); > } > > +static inline struct icc_node *icc_node_create_alloc_id(int start_id) > +{ > + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); > +} > + > static inline void icc_node_destroy(int id) > { > } > -- > 2.39.2 >
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 04:14:27PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote: > Add Epoch Subsystem (EPSS) L3 interconnect provider binding on > SA8775P SoCs. 1. And why is this not compatible with sm8250? There was lengthy discussion and no outcome of it managed to get to commit msg. Really, so we are going to repeat everything again and you will not get any acks. You have entire commit msg to explain things but instead you repeat what the patch does. We can read the diff for that. 2. Binding *ALWAYS* comes before the user. > > Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > index 21dae0b92819..94f7f283787a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,sm6375-cpucp-l3 > - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3 > + - qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3 > - const: qcom,epss-l3 Your driver suggests this is not really true - it is not compatible with qcom,epss-l3. Maybe it is, maybe not, no clue, commit explains nothing. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 04:14:25PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote: > Current interconnect framework is based on static IDs for creating node > and registering with framework. This becomes a limitation for topologies > where there are multiple instances of same interconnect provider. Add > icc_node_create_alloc_id() API to create icc node with dynamic id, this > will help to overcome the dependency on static IDs. This doesn't overcome the dependency on static ID. Drivers still have to manually lookup the resulting ID and use it to link the nodes. Instead ICC framework should be providing a completely dynamic solution: - icc_node_create() should get a completely dynamic counterpart. Use e.g. 1000000 as a dynamic start ID. - icc_link_create() shold get a counterpart which can create a link between two icc_node instances directly, without an additional lookup. You can check if your implementation is correct if you can refactor existing ICC drivers (e.g. icc-clk and/or icc-rpm to drop ID arrays completely). > > Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/interconnect/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 6 +++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) >
On 1/12/2025 2:27 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 04:14:25PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote: >> Current interconnect framework is based on static IDs for creating node >> and registering with framework. This becomes a limitation for topologies >> where there are multiple instances of same interconnect provider. Add >> icc_node_create_alloc_id() API to create icc node with dynamic id, this >> will help to overcome the dependency on static IDs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> >> --- >> drivers/interconnect/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 6 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c >> index 9d5404a07e8a..0b7093eb51af 100644 >> --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c >> @@ -858,6 +858,38 @@ struct icc_node *icc_node_create(int id) >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_node_create); >> >> +/** >> + * icc_node_create_alloc_id() - create node and dynamically allocate id >> + * @start_id: min id to be allocated >> + * >> + * Return: icc_node pointer on success, or ERR_PTR() on error >> + */ >> +struct icc_node *icc_node_create_alloc_id(int start_id) > > By having clients pass in start_id, you distribute the decision of what > a "good number" is across multiple parts of the system (or you have > clients relying on getting [start_id, start_id + N) back). > > Wouldn't it be better to hide that choice in one place (inside the icc > framework)? > Yes, inline to Dmitry's suggestion I will be moving the start_id to framework and all dynamic allocations will start from 10000. > Regards, > Bjorn > >> +{ >> + struct icc_node *node; >> + int id; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&icc_lock); >> + >> + node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!node) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + >> + id = idr_alloc(&icc_idr, node, start_id, 0, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (id < 0) { >> + WARN(1, "%s: couldn't get idr\n", __func__); >> + kfree(node); >> + node = ERR_PTR(id); >> + goto out; >> + } >> + node->id = id; >> +out: >> + mutex_unlock(&icc_lock); >> + >> + return node; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_node_create_alloc_id); >> + >> /** >> * icc_node_destroy() - destroy a node >> * @id: node id >> diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h >> index f5aef8784692..4fc7a5884374 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h >> +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-provider.h >> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct icc_node { >> int icc_std_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw, >> u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak); >> struct icc_node *icc_node_create(int id); >> +struct icc_node *icc_node_create_alloc_id(int start_id); >> void icc_node_destroy(int id); >> int icc_link_create(struct icc_node *node, const int dst_id); >> void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider); >> @@ -141,6 +142,11 @@ static inline struct icc_node *icc_node_create(int id) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP); >> } >> >> +static inline struct icc_node *icc_node_create_alloc_id(int start_id) >> +{ >> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); >> +} >> + >> static inline void icc_node_destroy(int id) >> { >> } >> -- >> 2.39.2 >>
On 1/13/2025 1:44 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 04:14:25PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote: >> Current interconnect framework is based on static IDs for creating node >> and registering with framework. This becomes a limitation for topologies >> where there are multiple instances of same interconnect provider. Add >> icc_node_create_alloc_id() API to create icc node with dynamic id, this >> will help to overcome the dependency on static IDs. > > This doesn't overcome the dependency on static ID. Drivers still have to > manually lookup the resulting ID and use it to link the nodes. Instead > ICC framework should be providing a completely dynamic solution: > - icc_node_create() should get a completely dynamic counterpart. Use > e.g. 1000000 as a dynamic start ID. > - icc_link_create() shold get a counterpart which can create a link > between two icc_node instances directly, without an additional lookup. > Agreed, with current implementation, still there is dependency on IDs for linking the nodes. Instead of relying on node names for the links, array of struct pointers will be used, this will eliminate the need for ID lookup and avoids extra loops. Instead of providing counter part for the ICC framework APIs which involves duplication of most of the code, I will modify the existing icc_node_create, icc_link_create and icc_node_add APIs to support both static and dynamic IDs. > You can check if your implementation is correct if you can refactor > existing ICC drivers (e.g. icc-clk and/or icc-rpm to drop ID arrays > completely). > ok, I will check the implementation on icc-rpmh driver for sa8775p SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com> >> --- >> drivers/interconnect/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 6 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) >> >